Wired article: “How Click Fraud Could Swallow the Internet” Discussion of click fraud, impression fraud, splogs and zombie networks, and whether cost-per-action advertising is the answer.
BlogRoll In The New
Happy New Year To:
The First Amendment Minute
TechLawAdvisor
CopyFight.
Silicon Valley Media Law
Eff: DeepLinks
IPKat
Tech Law Prof Blog
Patry Copyright
Igor Branding
NerdLaw
Weatherall’s Law
No Such Weblog
Technology and Marketing Law Blog
IP Counsel Blog
WiredGC
Death In The Afternoon
Discourse.net
Between Lawyers
43(b)log
Rethink(IP)
and of course
TTABlog
Scan In The New
Blawg In The New
New INTEL Logo

Filed with the PTO December 21.
More On Whether INTEL INSIDE Is Out

In connection with rumors that the INTEL INSIDE mark will be dropped, IPKat provides a gallery of tarnishing images of the INTEL INSIDE mark which makes one wonder: Is tarnishment proof of fame?
Note: the IPKat entry starts with a non-Intel item on geographical indications that is worth reading as well.
I Know You Are But What Am I?
From the Splog Desk:
First, Jason Calcanis points out that Online Cash King is republishing his blog without authorization.
Then Online Cash King points out that Online Cash King is republishing his blog without authorization.
Jason: Try this – post the following: I, Onlne Cash King admit to violating the Trademark and Copyright Acts and will consent to an order entered against me enjoining me from all such future acts and paying Jason Calcanis damages in the amount of One Trillion Dollars.
LAWYERS.COM Unregistrable As Generic Term
Citable TTAB decision rejecting application for LAWYERS.COM on genericness grounds.
Echoing TTablog, my reaction to the decision was ‘coulda told you that in fewer than 29 pages’ although to be fair to the Board, most of the decision is concerned with shutting down a ploy in drafting applications for [generic].com marks.
Trademarks build brands and domain names build pre-brand traffic. When it comes to generic domain names, it appears that you cannot have everything (though some of us will keep trying).
Starbucks v. Charbucks
Starbucks fails to prove CHARBUCKS dark roasted blend ‘tarnishes’ Starbucks brand. Via Starbucksgossip.