CRYE v. DURO
Would've liked to see discussion whether there can be protectable trade dress in a camoflage patternhttps://t.co/kF0jDU0gL8— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 30, 2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act
Useful summary of DTSA:
Implementing and Interpreting the Defend Trade Secrets Act
Patently-O https://t.co/8n4Q9sUaKv— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 29, 2016
Ex Parte Seizures and the Defend Trade Secrets Act
Eric Goldman
SSRN https://t.co/saF95qiQXN— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 28, 2016
The New 'Defend Trade Secrets Act' Is The Biggest IP Development In Years
Forbes https://t.co/bnNTPV3bXV—
https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2016/04/8016.html
UDRP complaint denied on first prong: Complainant fails to establish secondary meaning in common law markhttps://t.co/tWa0gvpV9j
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 28, 2016
Most expensive domain names of all time
Business Insider https://t.co/pXELj3vpC8— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 28, 2016
BWP Media USA v Clarity Digital Group, 10th Cir re Use of DMCA re Content Generated by Independent Contractors
Justia summary: Plaintiff-Appellant BWP Media USA, Inc. d/b/a Pacific Coast News and National Photo Group, LLC (“BWP”) appealed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant-Appellee Clarity Digital Group, LLC n/k/a AXS Digital Media Group, LLC (“AXS”). BWP owned the rights to photographs of various celebrities. In February 2014, BWP filed
https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/2016/04/8009.html
Unequal 3 stripes forming a sideways E, still too similar to the Adidas stripes
ADIDAS v. SKECHERS
D. Oregon https://t.co/VlBtU3gIzS— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 26, 2016
History of California, as seen in the labels registered with the trademark applications. https://t.co/X3fnxBnK2A
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 23, 2016
Ain't Holding Nothing Back
COMMODORES ENT CORP v. McClary,
A Haas Divided Will Not Stand
. . . or when the HAAS mark is the housemark. I can stop making horrible puns any time I want to. 43blog summary here.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/03/haas-door-v-haas-garage-door-ND-Ohio-1.pdf”]
Laos Now Accepts Multi-Class Applications
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/03/laos-1.pdf”]
Energizer Bunny v Duracell Bunny
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/02/energizer-bunny-complaint-1.pdf”]
OUTTHINK v IBM OUTTHINK
IBM was associated with the logo THINK at one point.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/02/outthink-v-ibm-1.pdf”]
Tatoo Artists v Take-Two re Depiction of Tatoos in Video Game (SDNY)
Solid Oak, representing various tatoo artists sues a video game publisher which depicts the tatoos on NBA stars such as LeBron and Kobe.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/02/solid-oak-v-take-two-tatoo-complaint-1.pdf”]