Aidadas v Skechers
Skechers challenged the district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction prohibiting it from selling shoes that allegedly infringe and dilute adidas America, Inc.’s Stan Smith trade dress and Three-Stripe trademark. The panel affirmed in part, holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing the preliminary
McGowen Precision Barrels v Proof Research, TTAB can no. 92067618 (precedential).
Petitioner seeks cancellation of Respondent’s registration for a configuration trademark:
a gun barrel trade dress registration described as:
The “mottled” appearance was created by wrapping carbon fiber around a gun barrel, “curing” the fiber, grinding it and polishing it. As carbon fiber is substituted
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2020/12/yoga-sling-trade-dress-complaint-1.pdf” download=”all”]
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2020/12/glico-v-lotte-pocky-stick-third-circuit-petition-for-rehearing-1.pdf” download=”all”]
Justia summary: Skechers challenged the district court’s issuance of a preliminary injunction prohibiting it from selling shoes that allegedly infringe and dilute adidas America, Inc.’s Stan Smith trade dress and Three-Stripe trademark. The panel affirmed in part, holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing the preliminary injunction as to
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/06/schutte-v-kwik-lok-1.pdf”]
CRYE v. DURO
Would've liked to see discussion whether there can be protectable trade dress in a camoflage patternhttps://t.co/kF0jDU0gL8— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 30, 2016
REYNOLDS v. HANDI-FOIL,
ED VA
Discussion of aluminum foil trade dress
http://t.co/f4fFNqcJU4
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 7, 2014
From the knock-down drag-out world of religious prayer cards: plaintiff fails to establish trade dress in its catalog. Exhaustive discussion of analysis of trademark protection for the ‘look and feel’ of a catalog.
43(b)log discussion of Gerffert v Dean here.
gerffert trade dress in catalog.pdf
var docstoc_docid=’172360111′; var docstoc_title=’gerffert trade dress in catalog.pdf’; var
huh. Plaintiff owns an incontestable registration for RUFFLEBUTTS for children’s apparel. It spots a suspicious order by defendant, who (allegedly) indicates that it is seeking to copy plaintiff’s business (see Complaint paras 21 to 28). Plaintiff’s RUFFLEBUTT product illustrated on top, defendant’s RUFFLE BUNS below it. I don’t know what the market looks like, but