Sweet People Apparel v Saza Jeans, 14-1143-DMG (CD Cal May 25, 2016). Individual attorneys had been sanctioned under Rule 11/37 for ‘evasive or incomplete discovery’ (discovery docs had been redacted without proper indicia as such). Order of sanctions amended in absence of indication that trial counsel were personally responsible; law firm bears responsibility for
2016
9th Cir Continues To Not Apply OCTANE To Trademarks
Ninth Circuit reminds us that it already has decided that it is not bound to apply Octane Fitness’ (134 S. Ct. 1749) definition of “exceptional” in the context of the Lanham Act’s fee-shifting provision. Rather than evaluate ‘exceptional’ under a ‘totality of circumstances’ test, the Ninth Circuit will look to whether there was ‘malicious, fraudulent,…
Spot the Differences in These Nominative Fair Use Tests
Here is the first factor from the Ninth Circuit nominative fair use test, courtesy of the New Kids on the Block case:
First, the product or service in question must be one not readily identifiable without use of the trademark;
Here’s the first factor from yesterday’s Second Circuit decision:
(1) whether the use of the…
Text of Second Circuit Nominative Fair Use Case (IISSCC v SU)
Introducing the 2d Circuit Nominative Fair Use Test:
1. Whether plaintiff’s mark is necessary to describe both the plaintiff’s and defendant’s products, “that is, whether the product or service is not readily identifiable without use of the mark;
2. whether the defendant uses only so much of the plaintiff’s mark as is necessary to identify…
From The Denied UDRP Files
Somewhat vague explanation re choice of https://t.co/P88eidPYdP 'just plausible enough' to avoid bad faith https://t.co/HVFefwzqEJ
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 10, 2016
AQUAQUEEN.RO
This is properly a trademark dispute in Romania and not a UDRPhttps://t.co/81YN8zL3s2— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 10, 2016
Meet the Bloggers – INTA – Orlando – May 23
Invite your readers to meet you at
Meet the Bloggers
Orlando
Monday May 23
8 pm to 11 pmhttps://t.co/XBiFGLLfFE— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 9, 2016
Time’s Relentless Arrow Forward and Reverse Domain Name Hijacking
You cannot act in bad faith towards something that doesn’t exist yet.
Reverse domain name hijacking of https://t.co/itH6GSkDnR due to the Time's arrow relentlessly going forward#domainshttps://t.co/4bT94w9R9J
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 9, 2016
What Mis-Use Of A Photo Might Be
Defendant allegedly ran photos of plaintiff models, to promote defendant’s resorts. Discussion of what tort this might be (false advertisement, unjust enrichment), and what it might not be (negligence per se).
Also, complaint was a few hundred pages too long.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/05/caliente-motion-to-dismiss-1.pdf”]
5th Circuit Extends Octane Fitness Fee Rule to Trademarks
Noting the similarity between the language of Section 285 of the Patent Act, the Fifth Circuit extends Octane Fitness to cover Section 1117(a) of the Lanham Act as to what constittutes an exceptional case for purposes of awarding attorney’s fees. Departing from the standard that ‘exceptional’ means a case that is brought in bad faith,…
Recent @TrademarkBlog Tweets
43(B)log:
FESC:
Regulation by Internet Intermediarieshttps://t.co/euYVIU1N9Z— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 2, 2016
The IPKat:
Freedom of panorama in France: could even a visit to Père Lachaise become a problem? https://t.co/11wTUAR3jS— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 2, 2016
Lenz v. Universal: A Call to Reform Section 512(f) of the DMCA and to Strengthen Fair Use
Marc
…