Sweet People Apparel v Saza Jeans, 14-1143-DMG (CD Cal May 25, 2016). Individual attorneys had been sanctioned under Rule 11/37 for ‘evasive or incomplete discovery’ (discovery docs had been redacted without proper indicia as such). Order of sanctions amended in absence of indication that trial counsel were personally responsible; law firm bears responsibility for
Rule 11
Vexatious Litigant Order
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Rule 11, Vexatious Litigation
OMAHA STEAKS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PATHAK, CD Cal
Example of a Vexatious Litigant Order
http://t.co/VBlgb4mvbd
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 25, 2014
Yes, Judge Posner, But How Do You Really Feel?
By Marty Schwimmer on
Judge Posner awards fees against the Conan Doyle Estate. Special word search game: find the words ‘violate the antitrust laws’ in this decision.
Bonus reference to the Happy Birthday copyright scheme, uh, dispute.
var docstoc_docid=’172040056′; var docstoc_title=’klinger 7th circuit fees.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’klinger 7th circuit fees.pdf’;