Sweet People Apparel v Saza Jeans, 14-1143-DMG (CD Cal May 25, 2016). Individual attorneys had been sanctioned under Rule 11/37 for ‘evasive or incomplete discovery’ (discovery docs had been redacted without proper indicia as such). Order of sanctions amended in absence of indication that trial counsel were personally responsible; law firm bears responsibility for ‘making it clear . . . that this is an impermissible practice and to urge care safeguarding against it”
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/05/CD-Cal-Sweet-People-Saza-law-firm-sanctions-1.pdf”]