2016

Much has been written about the coming amendments to EU trademark law. We have a short attention span here so long-time friend to the Trademark Blog, Verena von Bomhard of Bomhard IP, boils down the essentials to six things trademark lawyers want to know about the new EU trademark law.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/01/6-things-trademark-lawyers-want-to-know-about-the-new-EU-trademark-law-1.pdf”]

freddo_large

Starbucks sues Coffee Culture for dilution and infringement arising from use of FREDDOCCINO, as well as false advertising relating to various ‘fair trade’ claims.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/01/frappucino-v-freddocino-complaint-1.pdf”]

The Trademark Company is reportedly the second largest filer of trademarks in the U.S. The USPTO appears to have been investigating the firm’s practices relating to that firm’s use of electronic signatures and the level of supervision by attorneys of that firm’s filed applications. The Trademark Company is protesting tactics taken by the PTO.

[embeddoc

Southern District Court of NY had previously declined to recognize transfer of STOLI marks to a quasi-government entity, FTE, thus holding that FTE had no standing to bring this infringement suit.  Second Circuit reverses:

“The declaration of a United States court that the executive branch of the Russian government violated its own law by transferring