Something to ponder this weekend:
First, there’s this must-read piece by Clay Shirky. It’s a little bit about content, more about the disingration (and atomization)of the newspaper business).
Then, check out the various links contained in this Time piece about the Stewart/Cramer dust-up (note especially Prof Balkin’s meditation on the corruption and degradation of journalism, specifically business journalism).

Via the Intellectual Property Constituency of ICANN, we learn that hte Board has unanimously adopted the following resolution regarding the protection of trademarks in the proposed new top level domains:
“Whereas, based on the public comment submissions received regarding new gTLD draft applicant guidebook, ICANN staff has determined that the implementation issues involving trademark protection need additional community input and analysis. These issues exist today within the existing gTLDs.
“Whereas, members of the community with knowledge and expertise in this area have proposed a way to synthesize the comments received in this area, and, with input from the broader community, including WIPO, propose solutions to the staff on these issues in a timely manner.
“Whereas the board recognizes that resolution of these issues would be beneficial to the introduction of new gTLDs, it is, therefore, resolved, that the board requests the GNSO’s intellectual property constiuency, in consultation with staff, to convene an implementation recommendation team comprised of an internationally diverse group of persons with knowledge, expertise, and experience in the fields of trademark, consumer protection, or competition law, and the interplay of trademarks and the domain name system to develop and propose solutions to the overarching issues of trademark protection in connection with the introduction of new gTLDs.
“It is further resolved that the implementation recommendation team will be comprised principally are from the organizations and persons that proposed such solutions in the public comment period on the first draft applicant guidebook, and the implementation recommendation team would use the solutions proposed in the public comments as its starting point for development.
“the board directs the implementation recommendation team to solicit input from the interested constituencies prior to its first session to ensure broad community input at the outset of its work.
The board further directs (1) staff to provide a dedicated staff person and additional staff resources as staff determines to facilitate the work of the implementation recommendation team and (2) reasonable travel support be provided to up to 15 members of the implementation recommendation team for the purpose of conducting two face-to-face meetings in hub cities.
“the board further requests that the implementation recommendation team distribute its draft report by the 24th of April, 2009, to interested members of the community for comment, and propose a final report to be published no later than the 24th of May, 2009, for consideration by the ICANN community at the Sydney meeting.”

bellini dnr.jpg
Since 1998 plaintiff Heller has been selling in the US a chair designed by Mario Bellini. The chair has received various design awards and is in the collection of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in NY. Heller filed for and received trademark registration 3,270,850 for the shape of the Bellini chair:
bellini chair reg drawing.jpg
Design Within Reach is a retailer of designer furniture. Since 1999 it has sold the Bellini chair and in fact spotlights Mario Bellini on its site (see above).
Heller now alleges that DNR has begun selling or will shortly begin selling a Bellini knock-off chair (the complaint is not yet on Pacer so I don’t have photos yet of defendant’s chair).
Previous chair disputes here and here.
Complaint Bellini Chair

OK, your advertising company, quoting the whole cluetrain conversation thing, proposes that you change your homepage to a realtime reproduction of the Twitter search results configured for your brand. In other words, if someone tweets “I love BRAND”, it shows up on your home page within seconds.
What do you think? You know that the several million Twitter users are going to check it out at least. Plus the attendant press coverage.
The Skittles.com experiment so far.
Twitter’s Terms of Service with regard to re-publishing posts here.