Plaintiff alleges that it uses the mark HANGINGOUT for a mobile video app. Google adopted GOOGLE HANGOUTS for a mobile video app at a later date. Drafting pointer: It’s advisable, when alleging trademark infringement, to have a straightforward allegation such as “Plaintiff uses the Mark in interstate commerce, and has made such use prior to
Uncategorized
DJ Action re ‘Re-purposed’ CHANEL Buttons
Here’s an interesting fact pattern. Who is the source of the jewelry pictured above? This jeweler. Jewelry companies purchase luxury clothes and ‘re-purpose’ the buttons (bearing the logo) into jewelry, and sell them on sites like this one. Val Colbert has brought a DJ action against Chanel.
Here is a post from Prof Goldman’s…
Trade Dress In Amusement Park Rides
Plaintiff sells amusement park rides. Above we see two of plaintiff’s rides, JUMP AROUND and the SAMBA BALLOON. Plaintiff accuses defendant of copying its trade dress (as well as advertising materials). Plaintiff has previously obtained an injunction against Defendant.
zamperla
var docstoc_docid=”163870612″;var docstoc_title=”zamperla”;var docstoc_urltitle=”zamperla”;
Pop a Shot v Pop Shot
var docstoc_docid=”163858796″;var docstoc_title=”pop a shot”;var docstoc_urltitle=”pop a shot”; pop a shot –
Ninth Circuit in Seven Arts on Copyright Statute of Limitations
The Copyright Act has a three year statute of limitations, however it is determined on a ‘rolling’ basis for normal copyright claims. The Court may consider acts that occurred up to three years prior to the date of filing the complaint. However, a dispute over copyright ownership between the parties occurs only once – suit…
NODOR v NODOR for pet products.
Plaintiff alleges Hartz Mountian infringes NODOR mark for pet products.
var docstoc_docid=”163777523″;var docstoc_title=”travellers umbrella”;var docstoc_urltitle=”travellers umbrella”; travellers umbrella –
Travelers Umbrella Logo v Legal & General Umbrella Logo
Travelers Insurance sues Legal & General Insurance for use of umbrella logo. There had been coexistence agreement(s) between the parties over the years.
travellers umbrella
var docstoc_docid=”163777523″;var docstoc_title=”travellers umbrella”;var docstoc_urltitle=”travellers umbrella”;
DJ: CRISPAW v CRISTAL
I don’t think any field is as litigated as dog chew toys that resemble luxury products. Here, CRISPAW v CRISTAL. This is not the first time this plaintiff brought a DJ against this defendant.
crispaw cristal
var docstoc_docid=”163666335″;var docstoc_title=”crispaw cristal”;var docstoc_urltitle=”crispaw cristal”;
PEAK6 INVESTMENTS v PEAK 9 CAPITAL
peak6 v peak 9
var docstoc_docid=”163553012″;var docstoc_title=”peak6 v peak 9″;var docstoc_urltitle=”peak6 v peak 9″;
SOLACE v SOLACE
I’m curious about count 4, forgery.
solace trademark
var docstoc_docid=”163458831″;var docstoc_title=”solace trademark”;var docstoc_urltitle=”solace trademark”;







