sprinkles v sprinkles
var docstoc_docid=”163458522″;var docstoc_title=”sprinkles v sprinkles”;var docstoc_urltitle=”sprinkles v sprinkles”;
Uncategorized
MAXIM v MAXIM
Maxim started as a men’s magazine and has become a ‘lifestyle’ brand. Defendant used MAXIM for anti-perspirant wipes for people with hyperhidrosis, a condition causing excessive sweating. Four years ago, defendant began selling scented wipes, and adopted a logo and packaging that, allegedly, is evocative of Maxim’s image. Maxim itself is moving into fragrance and…
DJ re CLORALEX v CLOROX
Cloralex brings DJ action regarding Clorox’ protests. Note use of graphics in paragraphs 27 to 32, to illustrate the ‘crowded field.’ Note paragraphs 39 to 61 to illustrate the length of the acquiescence.
cloratex v clorox dj
var docstoc_docid=”163190202″;var docstoc_title=”cloratex v clorox dj”;var docstoc_urltitle=”cloratex v clorox dj”;
Hersheys v Mars re Cross-Section of Snickers bar.
Hershey’s oppose Mars’ application for cross-section of Snickers bar on functionality grounds. Mars’ specimen was use of the cross-section on an in-store display.
hershey v mars
var docstoc_docid=”163163524″;var docstoc_title=”hershey v mars”;var docstoc_urltitle=”hershey v mars”;
FORT WORTH BRAHMAS v LONE STAR BRAHMAS
brahma hockey
var docstoc_docid=”162968310″;var docstoc_title=”brahma hockey”;var docstoc_urltitle=”brahma hockey”;
Roger Cleveland v Roger Cleveland re ROGER CLEVELAND
Second golf blog post today. Roger Cleveland designs golf clubs. He sold his company to plaintiff (which retains the CLEVELAND trademark), then joined defendant, Callaway. Callaway is now indicating on the club head itself that it is ‘designed by Roger Cleveland.’ See illustrations above.
roger cleveland trademark
var docstoc_docid=”162858942″;var docstoc_title=”roger cleveland trademark”;var docstoc_urltitle=”roger cleveland trademark”;…
PHOENIX OPEN and Shut Dispute?
This is a strange fact pattern. Plaintiff alleges that it has operated the PGA event, the PHOENIX OPEN (now known as the Waste Management Phoenix Open) for decades. Defendant approaches plaintiff and alleges that it owns the rights to PHOENIX OPEN. I couldn’t find any press reports on the dispute. Something is not right…
Slide Deck For My Latest Talk on Shape Law
Here are the slides discussing the patent, trademark and copyright ramifications of 3D scanning and printing, from our discussion last night at the NYC Bar Association.
shape law schwimmer
var docstoc_docid=”162615574″;var docstoc_title=”shape law schwimmer”;var docstoc_urltitle=”shape law schwimmer”;
I Will Be Speaking Tonight About 3D Printing and IP Law, 6 PM, NYC Bar
The True Measure of a Trademark Lawyer
I’m reading an article “Do Trademark Lawyers Matter” by Gerhardt and McClanahan. The article examined PTO filing data to attempt to answer the question: “does it make sense to hire a lawyer for trademark prosecution?” The article concludes that both a law degree and experience matter. Read the whole article.
The raw PTO ‘success…







