var docstoc_docid=”166454455″;var docstoc_title=”fiskars orange handled”;var docstoc_urltitle=”fiskars orange handled”; fiskars orange handled –

Discussion how authors of 1909 Act copyrights get one bite at the extended-term termination of rights apple. Also: lawyers can’t be expert witnesses as to interpretations of law.

coots v emicoots v emi

var docstoc_docid=’165722520′; var docstoc_title=’coots v emi’; var docstoc_urltitle=’coots v emi’;

Smuckers asserts trade dress rights in its gingham pattern on lids and packaging. It alleges that Nestles is selling baby food with gingham lids in Puerto Rico. See page 9 of complaint for photos of Nestle products in question.

nestle ginghamnestle gingham

var docstoc_docid=’165722167′; var docstoc_title=’nestle gingham’; var docstoc_urltitle=’nestle gingham’;

Plaintiff owns registrations for POQUITO MAS and -MAS variant trademarks. Taco Bell allegedly approached plaintiff for a consent to use LIVE A LITTLE MAS, and was rejected. Then Taco Bell adopted LIVE MAS.

poquito mas v live maspoquito mas v live mas

var docstoc_docid=’165706559′; var docstoc_title=’poquito mas v live mas’; var docstoc_urltitle=’poquito mas v…

When I skim lists of newly filed suits, I look out for situations where the defendants are well-known established companies. Most tend to be declaratory judgment situations (which in themselves are more interesting than the ‘normal’ infringement suit. Some tend to be interesting for miscellaneous reasons. This is the latter.

Cabela’s operates a large chain…

Seriously.

butter v bread and butterbutter v bread and butter

var docstoc_docid=’165294350′; var docstoc_title=’butter v bread and butter’; var docstoc_urltitle=’butter v bread and butter’;

Buttner v RD Palmer, NDNY, November27, 2013: Plaintiff alleges copyright infringement, as well as unjust enrichment. Discussion of relationship between federal copyright act and NY state business torts, as well as discussion of punitive and statutory damages under the Copyright Act.

buttner v rd palmer preemption

var docstoc_docid=’164854632′; var docstoc_title=’buttner v rd palmer preemption’; var…

My colleagues Yuval Marcus and Cameron Reuber successfully represented Defendant Marshak before the Ninth Circuit, which reversed the grant of a preliminary injunction.

reed v marshak 9th cir.pdf

var docstoc_docid=’164669143′; var docstoc_title=’reed v marshak 9th cir.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’reed v marshak 9th cir.pdf’;