This case, American Cruise Line v HMS American SteamBoat Queen, seems to suggest that it can be. I believe there are other cases that suggest otherwise (GoPets v. Hise).

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/08/AmericanCruiseLinesHMSAmericanQueenSteamboat20170816-1.pdf”]

hippie laundrychinese laundry

DJ Plaintiff uses HIPPIE LAUNDRY for clothing. DJ Defendant owns CHINESE LAUNDRY and DIRTY LAUNDRY for shoes. Defendant protested Plaintiff’s potential expansion of HIPPIE LAUNDRY into footwear.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/07/laundry-trademark-complaint-1.pdf”]

Sonneman, seller of lighting products, sues privacy service, NameCheap (provided of WhoisGuard), for protecting site used to sell infringing lighting products.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/06/sonneman-v-namecheap-complaint-1.pdf”]