Fragrances and e-Liquids (flavors for e-cigarette)s too dissimilar.

TTABlog commentary on LUSH VAPOR TTAB Decision.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/06/cosmetic-warriors-v-Trang-Diem-Tran-TTAB-LUSH-1.pdf”]

TTAblog discussion of TTAB decision in Original Maryland Fried Chicken, LLC v. MTM Enterprises Group, LLC, Opposition No. 91217560 (May 25, 2017) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Bergsman).

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/06/big-chicken-and-little-chicken-1.pdf”]

ABS-CBN, Philippines-based entertainment company, sues Florida entities for distributing devices used to illegally stream plaintiff’s content.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/05/abs-cbn-florida-streaming-complaint-1.pdf”]

Plaintiff appears to be selling beans and ground coffee (but also ‘brewed coffee’) while defendant operates coffee shops. For what it’s worth, in 2015 the TTAB refused registration of the mark RED WHALE for beer, citing a prior registration for RED WHALE for vodka (applicant there is plaintiff here).

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/05/red-whale-v-blue-whale-complaint-1.pdf”]

What does a counterfeit look like?
Coach, Inc. v. Chung Mei Wholesalehttps://t.co/qBJIrLyEC5

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 4, 2017

Seattle Mariners Oppose MAINE MARINERS for clothing. Opp. No. 91234252. pic.twitter.com/ENBUcsCTz4

— TTABlog (@TTABlog) May 1, 2017

In Soccer, Teams Change Logos at Their Peril – https://t.co/6HNDugMzN0 https://t.co/FkOCZk0Oug

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) April 29, 2017

Beware of

…

Her mind is Tiffany-twisted, she got the Mercedes bends
She got a lot of pretty, pretty boys, that she calls friends
How they dance in the courtyard, sweet summer sweat
Some dance to remember, some dance to forget

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/05/hotel-california-complaint-1.pdf”]

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/04/US-v-westchester-1.pdf”]

This could be an interesting case. Plaintiff uses diagonal marks as a decorative element (See top) but also as a trademark (see left image in the side-by-side). Defendant has logo registrations for diagonal marks. Plaintiff alleges that defendant’s sole use now is on the stitching on the back pocket of jeans (See right image in…