Ticketmaster v Prestige Entertainment, et. al., CD Cal, complaint filed yesterday:
Ticketmaster sells tickets online using its website and mobile apps. Its terms of use prohibits bots (software scripts designed to run tasks ‘at a far higher rate than would be possible for a human alone.’ It uses various methods to prohibit the use
The Honest Company, founded by Jessica Alba, sues re use of HONEST HERBAL for various products.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/Honest-Comapny-1.jpeg”]
Fish IP Law firm seeks declaratory judgment against Fish and Richardson.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/fish-v-fish-1.pdf”]
Photographer sues model, Gigi Hadid, for uploading copyrighted photo to her Instagram page. As an aside, note alteration of ADIDAS to HADID.
Case was filed in ED of Virginia. Plaintiff’s lawyer is from there, and that’s pretty much it.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/cepeda-v-hadid-1.pdf”]
When we lived in Chelsea, our local firehouse was Engine Co. 3, Ladder Co. 12. They would send firemen to visit our kids’ preschool. When we took the kids in the stroller by the firehouse, the firemen would let the kids climb on the firetrucks.
On 9/11, Engine Co. 3, Ladder Co. 12 lost five
See here for my prior post, including the text of the Dr Phil copyright fair use decision.
Re-cap: defendant was suing TV’s Dr. Phil in state court for torts arising from his allegedly abusive behavior. In order to show that Dr. Phil is someone who shouts, defendant, a former employee, obtained access to archival
Former employee of TV’s Dr Phil brings a state suit alleging various torts (including infliction of emotional distress). Seeking to document his abusive behavior, the defendant uses her iPhone to copy nine seconds of Dr. Phil archival footage, showing Dr Phil (allegedly) behaving badly in another incident, and seeks to use the clip as evidence.
D Missouri: Easton S150 not confusingly similar to Rawlings 5150. Prominent use of house marks given great weight in finding.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/rawlings-v-easton-d-mo-s150-1.pdf”]
Plaintiff Jetmax asserts copyright in ‘an ornamental light set comprised of a series of molded, decorative tear shaped covered lights with a wire frame over the covers.”
Defendant Advance, “produced the allegedly infringing product., which ‘has a teardrop shaped plastic cover with eight sets of double grooves, as well as a decorative wire frame containing
. . . is too long.