WSJ (no free online version available): The estate of Samuel Beckett does not allow any departure, not only from the text of his plays but from the extensive specific stage directions left by Beckett. It recently sought to enjoin an Italian production of ‘Waiting For Godot’ that cast women in the roles of Vladimir and Estragon.
Yahoo Fails To Obtain YAHU.COM and YAHU.COM.CN
Pacific Epoch: Yahoo lost an appeal to obtain the names YAHU.COM and YAHU.COM.CN in China. The article states that the current registrant’s name has the same pinyin, or phonetic rendering in roman characters, but uses different Chinese characters.
Best Title For An IP Post:
“‘Hooters’ Loses Its Appeal” re 11th Circuit affirmance of a lower court decision dismissing Hooters’ claim that a rival establishment infringed whatever rights it may have in the ‘Hooters Girl.’ Follow the links for interesting discussion regarding the extent to which an employee’s unifom can function as trade dress (pun intended).
NameProtect’s Trademark Insider
NameProtect’s Trademark Insider for the 1st quarter ’06 is out. Highlights include:
-70,860 U.S. trademark applications were filed, up 10% over the comparable period in ’05.
-Greenberg Taurig filed the most applications among law firms (542).
-Mattel filed the most applications among companies (230).
It’s interesting how fragmented this field is. The largest player has less than 1% market share.
You Can’t Include the Term ‘EBAY’ In Your Trademark or Tradename
. . . unless you’re eBay. Incidental to doing a search, I noticed that there were a gazillion dead and soon to be dead trademark applications for businesses providing ancilliary services to eBay sellers (e.g. WE WILL SELL YOUR STUFF ON EBAY FOR YOU or JOE’S EBAY DROP SHOP). These applicants could possibly use these terms to truthfully describe their businesses, but they simply can’t own a trademark that incorporates the mark of another. Just trying to save you the $275 or $325.
Five Sensational Types Of Trademarks?
We discussed ‘taste’ trademarks last week here.
Counterfeit Chic discusses the protection of scent, today.
‘Sight’ trademarks comprise 99.99% of all trademarks (my estimate).
Sound trademarks occur every so often (Intel’s ‘bah buh bo bah’, MGM’s lion roar, Tarzan’s yell, various jingles).
What about touch? Can a distinctive texture designate origin? (the feel of cotton?) (ultra suede – more like suede than suede itself?) I’m aware of one tactile mark – a German trademark registration for the word UNDERBERG in braille (courtesy the Non-traditional Trademark Archives).
JWelch emails me to suggest that a jar with a fuzzy label should be registrable (“reach for the fuzzy jar”).
IHT: “European trademarks vs. Google”
International Herald Tribune: “European trademarks vs. Google” (Paris appeals court expected to rule Wednesday in LVMH’s suit against Google for keyword sales).
I Can’t Define Parody But I Know It When I Download It From YouTube
The Content Industry That Cried Wolf?
Deep Links on the Consumer Electronics Association ad campaign documenting a century’s worth of content providers worrying about the effect of technology on copyrighted works.