LawGeek: “Should Yahoo! Be Able to Patent “Smart Drag And Drop”?
Whether “Smart Drag and Drop” can be patented is beyond the scope of this blog but readers may be interested in the Peer-to-Patent project described therein:
“The Peer-To-Patent Project is a new initiative by New York Law School’s Do Tank in cooperation with the U.S. Patent Office to use open source and open knowledge techniques to help stop the deluge of bad software patents in America. The project works by posting new software patent applications that have been voluntarily submitted by their inventors and asking the public to comment on them.”
Copyright Czar?
Slashdot: “U.S. to Get New IP Czar”
GIRLS GONE WILD v. GIRLS GONE WINE
I think we know where the NY Lawyer stands on this: “‘Girls Gone Wild’ Goon Sues ‘Girls Gone Wine‘”
Protection Of Foreign Famous Marks In NY
43(B)log: “If You Can Make It Anywhere, You Can Make It Here.”
“The Second Circuit certified two questions to the New York Court of Appeals. That court concluded that New York does have a common-law unfair competition claim, but that doesn’t include the famous/well-known marks doctrine. Except insofar as it actually does . . .”
Pulsonic Technology Is Not A Revolution In Shaving??

Phillips Domestic Applicances v. Braun and P&G, CV 07 CV 11290 (SDNY Dec 17 2007) (complaint on Pacer):
“Braun has been losing market share in the U.S. electric shaver business to Norelco – the brand owned by Phillips – for years . . . To reverse this trend, Braun and its new owner, P&G, needed to significantly refresh the Braun shaver line. But, because Defendants lacked any new true invention to offer consumers, Braun and P&G began to pretend that they did.” (Para 1, Complaint).
This is a false advertising case filed by Phillips in the SDNY yesterday concerning Braun’s advertising for its PULSONIC shaver. If Phillips allegations are correct, then a lot of comforting notions are going to fall away. For example, there’s no correlation between liquid rippling and skin rippling. Also, the presence of the ‘ripple’ in the skin, does not in fact depress the skin, thus exposing more hair. And, sadly, both the Pulsonic and the 360 Complete produce approximately 6 Pascals of acoustical pressure, not enough to create any sort of sonic effect.
Coverage here.
The Week In Dogs
Dog correspondents Ollie and Banner point us to “What Not Wear, Canine Edition” via Counterfeit Chic.
Dilution, Liquidation, Run-off

Designboom: “‘Liquidated Logos by Zev“:
“zevs is a young french artist who lives and works in paris. he doesn’t typically display his work in galleries, preferring instead to use the urban environment as the canvas for his street art. he has pioneered his own style of french street art that blurs the line between vandalism and art.”
“The Lotts, Lobbying and Domain Name Defense”
NY Times: “The Lotts, Lobbying and Domain Name Defense“:
“A report confirming an online union between Senator Trent Lott and former Senator John Breaux — breauxlott.com — raised questions because Mr. Lott is not allowed to join the lobbyist ranks for some time and has played down the prospect.”
GOT MILK v. GOT PUS
PETA is running ads to draw attention to the level of pus in milk as a result of udder infections in cows. The California Milk Processor Board is complaining.
Neologisms
This will be interesting:
Word Mark VAJAYJAY
Goods and Services beauty, hair care and personal care products
Serial Number 77337809
Filing Date November 27, 2007
Owner (APPLICANT) Twist, New.Brand.Venture
Background here.