This is Ebay

This is eGray, a site which comments on Californa Governor Gray Davis and California politics. 

This is Dr. Seuss Enterprises v. Penguin, the “Cat Is Not In The Hat” decision, in which the author mimicked Dr. Seuss’ literary and artistic style to comment on the O.J. Simpson case. 

Initial Interest Confusion doctrine is an important concept and I had hopes when I saw that Posner, J. was sitting on a panel hearing such a case.   Unfortunately, he didn’t write the decision and all we received was a somewhat simplistic endorsement of a controversial doctrine.

Equitrac competes with Promatek’s COPITRAK product.  At the urging of

The question as to whether Apple Footwear’s Apple design is confusingly similar to Guandong Apples’ Apple design may not involve novel issues of trademark law, but this article via China Daily indicates that this is the first preliminary injunction issued under the Peoples’ Republic of China’s revised Trademark law, makes the case of great import. 

Blogging was disrupted as Schwimmerlegal moved its entire legal staff to Mt. Pleasant, NY (right next to Armonk).  A tip of the hat to Benjamin and Ed and the guys at Value Electronics (see valueelectronics.com) for installing the satellite dish that brings this blog to you.  We now resume regular programming.

A doctrine which has populist appeal and found itself codified somewhat in the UDRP, but which has NOT been trademark case law since Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes blue-penciled it approximately 90 years ago, is “the sacred right to use one’s own name.”  If your name is Giorgio Armani, and you are not that Giorgio Armani