2003

FareChase uses software to “scrape” pricing information from American Airlines’ website.  AA has now enjoined FareChase in Texas state court on a trespass theory.  Denise (attorney for FareChase), has all the relevant papers, including a copy of the Temporary Injunction.  Quote from another FareChase attorney:

. . . the court has, by this order,

Somebody created two ads showing a woman performing a sex act on a man.  Both are wearing PUMA sportswear, the PUMA stripe prominently displayed.  The ads were forwarded to Adland with the comment that these ads ran in a Maxim-like publication in Brazil, a claim plausible only if you consider the high-fashion quality of the

Citigroup v. City Holding, 9 Civ 10115 (RWS) (SDNY Feb 7, 2003) (available at Courtweb).  Citigroup fails to cancel CITY INSURANCE registration and apparently tolerates use of CITY-variant marks by City Holding of West Virginia (see photo left).  Double edged sword:  Citigroup had previously had to argue that it could co-exist with a CITY-variant mark in the

Sunday night it was called Roogle.  Background all the way over here.  It would have killed them to have called a trademark lawyer before they picked a name.  I mean, I put in an instant message feature for people in a rush.

If you happen to invent something like a new grape, and have to name it, choose a term that describes it.  If you would rather pick a catchy name that suggests an attribute, then you ought to do a name search.  Here is the February 20 press release from Cornell announcing its creation of the

I don’t have the sitzfleisch to weigh in on the question as to whether “Governments own a part of the domain name system as a matter of international law,” but ICANNWATCH, which believes this theory is “unprecedented and unsupported,” does.  This is part of a larger article predicting that Paul Twomey, an Australian politician, will