2003

A Third Circuit decison interpreting the advertising injury provision of a commercial general liability insurance policy, holding that the insurer is obligated to pay for the insured’s defense against trademark infringment involving misuse of a domain name.  A plainitff had alleged that the insured had infringed its trademark in MAGAZINES.COM by utilizing MAGAZINE.COM to send traffic

I f I were Senator Hatch’s press secretary and I was trying to back him out of the remark reported in this Washington Post article where he allegedly said that maybe the only way to teach some people about copyrights would be to allow the copyright holder to destroy their computers, I would suggest to

Thanks to the Blog reader who sent this item in.  Reeling from its recent setback in the Spike TV case, Viacom must now defend itself against allegations that its use of ODORAMA in connection with its new Rugrats movie  (scratch and sniff card depicted above right) infringes John Waters’ rights in the term.  He

Page R1 of today’s Wall Street Journal: “Playing the Search-Engine Game.”  Good discussion of three prominent methods of  advertsiing on the web: paid listings, paid inclusion and search engine optimization.

Abercrombie fails establish that ABERZOMBIE.COM, which sells the t-shirts on the left, is confusingly similar to ABERCROMBIE, which sells the t-shirts on the right, in UDRP.  Decision here.

Links to info on Zombie movies here.