“. . . and don’t you forget my unicorns.’ I forget the rest. Irish Rovers, wow.
irsh rovers
var docstoc_docid=”144160187″;var docstoc_title=”irsh rovers”;var docstoc_urltitle=”irsh rovers”;
“. . . and don’t you forget my unicorns.’ I forget the rest. Irish Rovers, wow.
irsh rovers
var docstoc_docid=”144160187″;var docstoc_title=”irsh rovers”;var docstoc_urltitle=”irsh rovers”;
Shaw Industries seeks declaration against Hershey that it’s use of ‘Chocolate Kiss’ carpet color is not infringing.
shaw v hershey chocolatek iss
var docstoc_docid=”144158441″;var docstoc_title=”shaw v hershey chocolatek iss”;var docstoc_urltitle=”shaw v hershey chocolatek iss”;
Two financial services companies vie for the right to refer to Aesop’s fable about the tortoise and the hare, given that both firms are slow and steady.
shenkmen v ariel tortoise
var docstoc_docid=”144158034″;var docstoc_title=”shenkmen v ariel tortoise”;var docstoc_urltitle=”shenkmen v ariel tortoise”;
yolo v yolo
var docstoc_docid=”144062740″;var docstoc_title=”yolo v yolo”;var docstoc_urltitle=”yolo v yolo”;
By who? Everybody, nobody, who knows?
Ultimate Girls Night In v Girls Night In. Become a Passion Consultant.
girls night in
var docstoc_docid=”143232675″;var docstoc_title=”girls night in”;var docstoc_urltitle=”girls night in”;
David Boies once said that a lawyer shouldn’t consider themselves to be either a plaintiffs’ or defendants’ lawyer, because they would miss out on some good cases. After doing UDRPs for thirteen years, this is the first time I’ve ever appeared in a UDRP on behalf of a domain name registrant.
koshervitaminshoppe udrp
var docstoc_docid=”142397957″;var docstoc_title=”koshervitaminshoppe udrp”;var docstoc_urltitle=”koshervitaminshoppe udrp”;
The STANLEY STEEMER people own a registration for orange vans for carpet cleaners.
Stanley Steemer TRO
var docstoc_docid=”142046083″;var docstoc_title=”Stanley Steemer TRO”;var docstoc_urltitle=”Stanley Steemer TRO”;
afp v morel re twitter photo
var docstoc_docid=”142035259″;var docstoc_title=”afp v morel re twitter photo”;var docstoc_urltitle=”afp v morel re twitter photo”;
I use DISQUS software to manage the comments that appear at the bottom of individual posts. Today I noticed a new feature – links entitled ‘Also on The Trademark Blog’ and ‘Recommended For You.’ Disqus indicates that these links “help you find new and interesting content, discussions and products. Some sponsors and ecommerce sites may pay us for these recommendations and links. Learn more or give us feedback.” On one hand, Disqus is a useful service that I don’t pay for, so I don’t begrudge them monetizing the product. On the other hand, I’m fairly certain that they didn’t ask me my permission to do this (maybe they sent an email, who knows, but I certainly haven’t opted in). Now, I have never, in ten years, sold advertising space or agreed to paid (or unpaid) link exchanges. The only money I get from the Blog is the $20 I receive monthly from a certain famous trademark practice to not print bad news about them. If I don’t object to this, I can still say that I don’t sell advertising but there would an asterisk. Should I worry about more important stuff?