Following Herb Reed/eBay, D. Oregon denies TRO for failure to prove irreparable harm
SLEASH, LLC v. ONE PET PLANET http://t.co/IQTJ57jC7v
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 28, 2014
2014
Pro Se Case v Apple
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Uncategorized
Siri, What Is The Story With This? http://t.co/MPIJx8XDPr
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 28, 2014
Order Restraining Assets of Pirate Streaming Service
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Restraining Order re Assets
Example of Order Restraining Assets of Pirate TV Streaming Service
D. Oregon
http://t.co/d6PzvUSgWI
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 28, 2014
SWEAT SHOPPE for cycling studio v SWEAT SHOPPE for day spa
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Inherent Registrability
SWEAT SHOPPE for cycling studio v SWEAT SHOPPE for day spa
CD Cal
Def's summary judgment denied
http://t.co/E769FUpGIQ
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 25, 2014
Motion To Transfer: D.C. D. Nevada
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Forum Non Conveniens, Motion to Transfer
Las Vegas isn’t inconvenient than Texas, especially if the Texas witnesses can be deposed in Texas. Interesting (unsuccessful) argument using statistics of the Adminsitrative Office of US Courts, to argue that the case should be transferred to Texas because the time of filing to trial is lower than in LV.
GNLV, CORP. v. SOUTHEAST
…
Treble Damages Against Terminated Licensee
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Damages
DAIRY QUEEN v. YS&J ENTERPRISES,
DC NC
Treble damages against terminated licensee
http://t.co/9b6Dtc3ezB
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 25, 2014
Vexatious Litigant Order
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Rule 11, Vexatious Litigation
OMAHA STEAKS INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. PATHAK, CD Cal
Example of a Vexatious Litigant Order
http://t.co/VBlgb4mvbd
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 25, 2014
Obligation to Notify Insurer of IP Claim
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Insurance
Gelfman v. CAPITOL INDEMNITY
Discussion of obligation to notify insurer of potential IP claim
http://t.co/BsNQqtqEcF
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 25, 2014
Text of Redskins’ complaint appealing the TTAB decision
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Redskins Trademark, Scandalous and Immoral!
This is the Redskins’ appeal of the TTAB decision cancelling their REDSKINS registrations. This is a de novo appeal to the US District court in the Eastern District of Virginia.
var docstoc_docid=’172156706′; var docstoc_title=’redskins v blackhorse.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’redskins v blackhorse.pdf’;
8th Cir: Fortis v Warner Bros (CLEAN SLATE)
By Marty Schwimmer on
Posted in Artistic Relevance, First Amendment
Justia.com Opinion Summary: Fortres develops and sells a desktop management program called “Clean Slate” and holds a federally-registered trademark for use of that name to identify “[c]omputer software used to protect public access computers by scouring the computer drive back to its original configuration upon reboot.” When Warner Bros. Entertainment used the words “the…