Plaintiff sells amusement park rides. Above we see two of plaintiff’s rides, JUMP AROUND and the SAMBA BALLOON. Plaintiff accuses defendant of copying its trade dress (as well as advertising materials). Plaintiff has previously obtained an injunction against Defendant.
zamperla
var docstoc_docid=”163870612″;var docstoc_title=”zamperla”;var docstoc_urltitle=”zamperla”;
var docstoc_docid=”163858796″;var docstoc_title=”pop a shot”;var docstoc_urltitle=”pop a shot”; pop a shot –
The Copyright Act has a three year statute of limitations, however it is determined on a ‘rolling’ basis for normal copyright claims. The Court may consider acts that occurred up to three years prior to the date of filing the complaint. However, a dispute over copyright ownership between the parties occurs only once – suit
Plaintiff alleges Hartz Mountian infringes NODOR mark for pet products.
var docstoc_docid=”163777523″;var docstoc_title=”travellers umbrella”;var docstoc_urltitle=”travellers umbrella”; travellers umbrella –
Travelers Insurance sues Legal & General Insurance for use of umbrella logo. There had been coexistence agreement(s) between the parties over the years.
travellers umbrella
var docstoc_docid=”163777523″;var docstoc_title=”travellers umbrella”;var docstoc_urltitle=”travellers umbrella”;
I don’t think any field is as litigated as dog chew toys that resemble luxury products. Here, CRISPAW v CRISTAL. This is not the first time this plaintiff brought a DJ against this defendant.
crispaw cristal
var docstoc_docid=”163666335″;var docstoc_title=”crispaw cristal”;var docstoc_urltitle=”crispaw cristal”;
peak6 v peak 9
var docstoc_docid=”163553012″;var docstoc_title=”peak6 v peak 9″;var docstoc_urltitle=”peak6 v peak 9″;
I’m curious about count 4, forgery.
solace trademark
var docstoc_docid=”163458831″;var docstoc_title=”solace trademark”;var docstoc_urltitle=”solace trademark”;
sprinkles v sprinkles
var docstoc_docid=”163458522″;var docstoc_title=”sprinkles v sprinkles”;var docstoc_urltitle=”sprinkles v sprinkles”;
Maxim started as a men’s magazine and has become a ‘lifestyle’ brand. Defendant used MAXIM for anti-perspirant wipes for people with hyperhidrosis, a condition causing excessive sweating. Four years ago, defendant began selling scented wipes, and adopted a logo and packaging that, allegedly, is evocative of Maxim’s image. Maxim itself is moving into fragrance and