Selfridges offers ‘no noise’ ‘de-branded designs.’

Policy considerations: (1) we don’t want impediments to parties dropping claims; (2) we want impediments to parties bringing questionable claims.

nike already supreme court
var docstoc_docid=”141422232″;var docstoc_title=”nike already supreme court”;var docstoc_urltitle=”nike already supreme court”;

Because CISCO is using TOMORROW STARTS HERE, for which East Carolina has a registration.

east carolina v cisco
var docstoc_docid=”141418095″;var docstoc_title=”east carolina v cisco”;var docstoc_urltitle=”east carolina v cisco”;

On February 1, tell them that you’re working from home that day. Come to our offices in White Plains, have lunch, shmooze a little about social media, and get CLE credit. Then we go The Westchester for some shopping, a movie at the de Lux, then finish with drinks at 42.

Plaintiff is a fashion model. Co-defendant photographer allegedly misrepresented the purpose of a photo shoot and the model’s image was used as the ‘face’ of co-defendant cosmetic line. Plaintiff brings federal false endorsement and various NY claims including Civil Rights Law Section 51. Defendants move for judgment on the pleadings. Discussion of pleading standards for…

Practitioners in registered-rights jurisdictions, also known as pretty much every trademark lawyer in the world other than the US ones and a few other use-based fans, are encouraged to ‘over-file’ – to identify way more goods/services and way more classes than the applicant actually uses in relation to the mark. That might be the right…

Hmmm. GM failed to provide convincing evidence of bad faith. I think it would have easily won this case in 1999. GM v Chad Clegg.

fendi reed second circuit
var docstoc_docid=”140838473″;var docstoc_title=”fendi reed second circuit”;var docstoc_urltitle=”fendi reed second circuit”;