SDNY departs from first-filed rule, enjoining Florida action as it was ‘improper anticipatory’ action filed one day before ‘natural plaintiff’s’ SDNY action.
sdny declaratory judgement miller fabircs
var docstoc_docid=”122761425″;var docstoc_title=”sdny declaratory judgement miller fabircs”;var docstoc_urltitle=”sdny declaratory judgement miller fabircs”;
2012
Second Circuit Affirming Rule 11 Sanctions
2d cir rule 11 hoisin
var docstoc_docid=”122731919″;var docstoc_title=”2d cir rule 11 hoisin”;var docstoc_urltitle=”2d cir rule 11 hoisin”;
Initial Fun Facts From The TLD List
After a first scan of the list: the winner is .APP, with 13 applications. The only obvious trademark conflict I saw involved .COACH (2 applications) and .MONSTER (2 applications). (UPDATE – Google filed by .ING, but ING didn’t. Also, .SAS filed for by two different applicants) Google and Amazon will butt heads over several generics.…
Here Is The List of New gTLD Applications
var docstoc_docid=’122636137′; var docstoc_title=’gTLD List’; var docstoc_urltitle=’gTLD List’;
Revel In Reveal Day
Live from ICANN’s secret underground headquarters:
Open and Notorious
EDNY: Personal Jurisdiction in NY Arising From Trap Sales, Amazon and eBay ‘Stores’
EDNY court exercises personal jurisdiction over defendant whose contacts with New York consist of three trap sales to plaintiff and fairly successful ‘stores’ on Amazon and eBay.
edny envirocare personal jurisdiction
var docstoc_docid=”122491974″;var docstoc_title=”edny envirocare personal jurisdiction”;var docstoc_urltitle=”edny envirocare personal jurisdiction”;
Have You Received Mail From Day Group LLC or DayGr.com?
Would your accounting department process the document reproduced below? Maybe it has. Consider:
Title 39, United States Code, Section 3001, makes it illegal to mail a solicitation in the form of an invoice, bill, or statement of account due unless it conspicuously bears a notice on its face that it is, in fact, merely
…
Not That The Case Turns On This . . .
. . . but it’s a little odd that Bogart’s lawyers don’t know that Claude Rains, and not Bogart, delivers the line ‘Round Up The Usual Suspects.’ See para. 25, page 7 of the state complaint. Burberry should certainly deny that allegation.
Coverage here.
bogart v burberry
var docstoc_docid=”121643001″;var docstoc_title=”bogart v burberry”;var docstoc_urltitle=”bogart v
What Would You Think If ‘adidas’ And ‘Three Stripes’ Weren’t In The Title Of This Post?
Adidas sues Wolverine for infringement of adidas’ three strip mark. Pictures of the allegedly infringing footwear on pages 11 and 12 of the complaint (one is pictured above).
Para 61 on page 19 is interesting as it alleges that the infringing footwear ‘also’ dilutes’ adidas’ rights in 34 states other than Oregon (where the suit…

