2003

This NY Times article is a must-read on digital rights management.

Law school hypo – Customer buys, let’s say a Tivo-enabled receiver from a satellite or cable tv provider. Vendor does not reveal to customer that the box contains DRM technology which vendor can enable remotely.  Vendor does so, effectively prevent customer from engaging in legal behavior, such

Via BNA Internet Law News we learn of a decision from the Eastern District of Louisiana, Greg Lloyd Smith v. Intercosmos Media, civ no. 02-1964 Section C, 2002 US Dist LEXIS 24251 (ED La Dec. 17).  Plaintiffs brought state tort claims against Defendant, a domain name registrar.  Plaintiffs claimed to have been libeled by various

This article reports that Verisign, registry operator of .com, is returning to the NETWORK SOLUTIONS brand for its registrar unit.  If so, it’s UK operations will have to do without the domain name NETSOL.CO.UK, which, as reported here, was dropped and registered by someone named NameGrab.  As to the reputation of the

More on the sex.com litigation via Law.com.  The Ninth Circuit has punted the case to the California Supreme Court.  At issue is registrant’s abilities to obtain compensation in part from NSI, due to its allegedly negligent handling of his domain name which was the subject of a fraudulent transfer.  The fraudfeasor has no visible assets

Do a Google News of Peter Pan Copyright and you will coverage like this of the lawsuit filed by owner of the Peter Pan copyright.  Peter Pan appeared in a series of works in the UK in 1904.  Determining when and if characters fall into the public domain can be complex (see this excellent resource for international