22
Jun/10

Whether Pork or Unicorns Are The New White Meat


A new one for the Coulrophobia archives:
ThingGeek: Officially our best-ever cease and desist. Pork Board sells c&d to ‘unicorn meat’ vendor for using the slogan ‘the white meat.’
In ThinkGeek’s press release, it notes that the product was released April1. It has also been reported that unicorns are mythical.



10
Mar/10

5 Possible Reasons Why Lindsay Lohan Filed That Talking-Baby Lawsuit


5 Possible Reasons Why Lindsay Lohan Filed That Talking-Baby Lawsuit. I’m going with numbers 1 (she believes she can win); and (4) she gets publicity (note how we’re talking about her). Also add number (6): people will be less likely to use her persona without authorization.



9
Mar/10

Lindsay Sues eTrade.



You know who I mean, right? Lindasay Lohan sues eTrade under NY Civil Rights Law Section 51, in Nassau County Supreme Court, NY, for $50 million. Lindsay the milkaholic baby, allegedly refers to her.
Practice pointer: Avoid use of word ‘parody’ when describing defendant’s acts.
The Naked Cowboy case is one of the more recent NY Section 51 cases around these parts (embedded below).
Hat Tip: AGL
Complaint Lindsay Etrade
Decision Naked Cowboy Right of Publicity



1
Mar/10

Spot The Lawsuit In This Commercial


(‘)(‘) <- me rolling my eyes

Complaint LV Hyundai



22
Jan/10

TRO Denied re Parody of Prop 8 Group's Logo


prop 8 logo.gif
prop_8_trial_tracker.JPG
Anti-prop 8 advocacy group uses parody of pro-Prop 8 advocacy group. TRO of parody denied. Trademark Blog Coulrophobia archive here.
Decsion Protect Marriage Parody



19
Nov/08

I Can't Afford To Heart NY


icantaffordtoloveny.jpg
From here.



30
Oct/08

Wassup WIth The Wassup Parody


Turns out that the director of the original Wassup commercial for Bud had retained the rights and had merely licensed the property to Busch, and that’s why he can do a ‘parody’ for Obama. Story here.



25
Oct/08

Wassup Parody



Original:



23
Jul/08

Trademark Infringement Makes Small Children Cry


party dora.jpg
. . . or perhaps it was the trademark enforcement.
Wall Street Journal article on trademark owners policing use of character costumers by local party performers: “Why Dora the Explorer Can’t Come To Your Kid’s Birthday Party“:

. . . .Though the walk-about “Dora” had the expected pageboy haircut and backpack, her expression was blank and her legs appeared out of proportion to the rest of her body. “When Dora came out,” Mrs. Sorkin says, “none of the kids would go to Dora, including my daughter, and a few of the kids started crying.”
Elvira Grau, who owns Space Odyssey USA, where Mrs. Sorkin held her daughter’s party, says the costume companies that service her parties try to make their costumes look sufficiently different from the trademarked characters to avoid lawsuits. When Mrs. Sorkin complained to her that Dora was “hideous,” Mrs. Grau gave her a $250 credit. “But I told her, ‘You can’t have the real Dora. If you want the real Dora, call Nickelodeon.’ ”

Every sentence in this article is both funny and extremely sad.
There is a sentiment expressed by Justice Stevens in Moseley v V Secret, that where there is no confusion, a tarnishing use reflects on the tarnisher and not the trademark owner. It might be the case that where there is no confusion that the local children’s clown is ‘licensed’ by anyone, that if the clown stumbles around drunk or otherwise behaves inappropriately, in a character costume, that that reflects on the clown, and not on the costume.
Comment away.



16
Jun/08

Goodnight Nobody


goodnight bush.jpg
goodnight moon.gif
NY Times: “The Secret to Success in Publishing: Bash Bush, With Nods to a Classic“:

The cover of “Goodnight Bush” looks almost exactly like “Goodnight Moon — green and orange, with an image of a window and fireplace — and uses a similar rhyme scheme. But there the thematic similarities end.
The authors, Erich Origen and Gan Golan, set their story in “a situation room.” There is no bunny snuggling into bed, but rather George W. Bush, grinning and wearing a “Mission Accomplished” flight suit. Instead of three little bears sitting on chairs, there are “war profiteers giving three cheers.”

Well, let’s see. First I would read the book and dust off one of our copies of “Goodnight Moon.” I would check out the Cat Is Not In The Hat case, then the Priceless decision, and take it from there.
UPDATE: 43(b)log take on this.