New York Post v someone who isn’t the New York Post. A little sad.
var docstoc_docid=’172969776′; var docstoc_title=’nyp v new york post.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’nyp v new york post.pdf’;
New York Post v someone who isn’t the New York Post. A little sad.
var docstoc_docid=’172969776′; var docstoc_title=’nyp v new york post.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’nyp v new york post.pdf’;
Smith v. MIKKI MORE
A sordid tale of independent contractor and copyright
http://t.co/4ceIJLanRw
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 17, 2014
WISH ATLANTA v. CONTEXTLOGIC
1% of sales and some suppliers in Georgia sufficient for minimum contacts
http://t.co/jlY8Q2cZDh
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 17, 2014
PAUSCH v. TI-BA,
Accepting orders from New Jersey doesn't rise to minimum contacts with NJ
http://t.co/ABwu4TRcQo
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 17, 2014
Scotts pushes defendant to migrate from GRO1 to GROW1
http://t.co/NIoYCJswmE
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 17, 2014
Are J L Rich and Louis Rich the same respondent?
http://t.co/G8WMHvsJFu
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 17, 2014
http://t.co/0x1LuuD26l
The first .SERVICES UDRP I've Seen http://t.co/9h1PUmSG3a
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 17, 2014
Not exactly clear who was responsible for the domain name transfer not working
http://t.co/rUl8WTUTsH
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 14, 2014
Slep-Ton v Kugel:
I think the lesson of this case is to finish all the paperwork necessary to resolve a matter
http://t.co/fjp1SLxGvH
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 14, 2014
43(B)log:
Pleading standards for false advertising
http://t.co/5X77Qa8T8h
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) October 14, 2014
Plaintiff uses MYRA to promote retirement accounts. Barack Obama promoted the myRA retirement account in his State of the Union address. Plaintiff sues US Treasury for trademark infringement. In two minutes of Googling I found that there is a Trademark Remedy Clarification Act that purports to limit sovereign immunity with regard to trademarks and at least one Circuit decision that held that provision to be unconstitutional.
Mr. President, the next time you are considering the use and registration of a trademark, we hope you consider our firm. We offer Manhattan credentials at White Plains prices.
var docstoc_docid=’172872523′; var docstoc_title=’myra v myra.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’myra v myra.pdf’;
The International Trademark Association (“INTA”) is pleased to host the Sixth Annual Trademark Scholarship Symposium during the 137th INTA Annual Meeting in San Diego, California. The Symposium will take place on Monday, May 4, 2015 as part of INTA’s Academic Day and is an opportunity for trademark scholars from around the world (including part-time and full-time professors, graduate and post-graduate students) to participate in small group discussions of scholarly works-in-progress. Each selected scholar will present their project in a workshop setting, receive comments, and engage in a dialogue with other academic scholars and accomplished trademark practitioners.
Please send an abstract (approximately 300 words) describing a current trademark or unfair competition scholarship project to project co-chairs Julie Cromer Young at jcromer@tjsl.edu and Jim Faier at jmfaier@faier.com by November 1, 2014. The project team will then select a maximum of 8 projects to be presented at the Symposium, grouped into related topics or themes. Selections will be announced by February 1, 2015. For each selected project, a working draft of the paper (10-20 pages) must be submitted by March 15, 2015. There is no publication obligation.
Participants will receive complimentary registration to the Academic Day program, including an all-professor panel exploring boundaries of trademark law, a trademark professor luncheon, a reception and other networking opportunities. Additional expenses are the speaker’s responsibility. For INTA membership and Annual Meeting registration information, please contact Nilsa Laboy at nlaboy@inta.org.
var docstoc_docid=’172595967′; var docstoc_title=’la crema v creme solaire.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’la crema v creme solaire.pdf’;
The demand letter from the owners of the PABST mark was sent September 12. VIP Products, maker of chew toys for dogs which parody well-known trademarks, filed the declaratory judgment action on September 19. I have blogged about a previous DJ action brought by this plaintiff relating to CRISPAW (CRISTAL),
blue cats trippin v pabst blue ribbon.pdf
var docstoc_docid=’172593169′; var docstoc_title=’blue cats trippin v pabst blue ribbon.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’blue cats trippin v pabst blue ribbon.pdf’;
That name again is Dr Numb:
How to plead a prima facie case for a variety of trademark causes in the CD Cal
http://t.co/HTsV1v3R1P
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 20, 2014
Colorado unfair comp:
Pltf didn't allege GoPro copied non-functional elements
http://t.co/C5sHkVQjZJ
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 20, 2014
2 pts here:
1 – Better to amend the complaint than amend it 'sub rosa' in a brief;
2. Hire attys to write wills
http://t.co/5iAu5AFqEe
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 20, 2014
Skinny Pop Popcorn claims family of SKINNY marks; goes after OH SO SKINNY popcorn.
var docstoc_docid=’172530298′; var docstoc_title=’skinny pop.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’skinny pop.pdf’;
Deckers (owner of the UGG brand) has been going after ‘Bailey Button’ knock-offs. I blogged a complaint against Wal-Mart here.
Deckers also sued JC Penney on multiple grounds. Penney moved to dismiss. The design patent action survived. The ‘passing off’ action was dismissed under Dastar, under the ‘please don’t use trade dress to create a perputual patent/copyright right’ rationale.
Deckers may have design patent action, but not a passing off action, against JC Penney re 'Bailey Button' boot
http://t.co/Nch2lro21d
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 16, 2014
"The song is so well-known it has its own wikipedia entry"
http://t.co/I62bc6TJre
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 15, 2014
TTAB:
MINECRAFT v MINECRAP for, uh, crap you would buy to play Minecraft http://t.co/ysCkTrkkil
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 15, 2014
TTAB:
DALLAS MAVERICKS v MAVERICKS for fitness
http://t.co/uYMujFfzX1
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) September 15, 2014