Third Circuit reverses denial of prelim – district court had not considered non-customer confusion. d Ct took 4 years (!) to deny prelim.
Why Would You Not Have The Point Guard Design The New Clippers Logo?
Identify the Silhouettes (valid method of testing secondary meaning?)
Photo of Scarlett Johansson From Scarlett Johansson Movie Review Prompts Demand Letter by Higbee and Associates
TechDirt reports on demand letter sent to publisher of movie review that ran a still from the movie (depicted above).
Pro tip: When you receive a demand letter from the representative of a ‘stock photo’ agency, ask them to provide the copyright registration, proof that the photo in question is covered by that particular registration, and proof that the photographer assigned his or her rights to the copyright claimant.
FTC Letter to ICANN re Vox Populi’s .SUCKS Gtld
ICANN asked that the FTC look into whether anything Vox Populi (registry for .SUCKS) may done as illegal. The FTC responds: “now you ask?”
Add this incident to the “What is ICANN, Anyway?” case file. Is it a regulator? A standards-setting body? A trade association? A FIFA-like Chimera that sees itself operating outside the laws of the world?
Is this exchange with the FTC kabuki?
ftc-icann-sucks-27may15.pdf by martyschwimmerSorry the embed feature seems to be broken follow the link to the document
The Adventure of the Last Ten Sherlock Holmes Stories
The 50 earliest Sherlock Holmes stories are in the public domain. The Conan Doyle Estate alleges that the last ten stories are still under copyright. It alleges that a novel about Sherlock Holmes in his retirement, A Slight Trick of the Mind, and the upcoming movie based on that novel, copy elements of those last ten stories.
conan doyle copyright complaint.pdf by martyschwimmerSorry the embed feature seems to be broken follow the link to the document
A Few More Recent Trademark Decisions
WD Wash:
If You Negotiate W/ Def, Ask That They Agree To Waive SoL/Laches First
Eat Right v Whole Foods
http://t.co/D8NH7U81pj
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 25, 2015
"Original" as a Misstatement under 43(a)1(B)
The Original Bomb Pop v The Original Firecracker Pop
SDNY
http://t.co/jIuviIUycu
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 25, 2015
"Original" as a Misstatement under 43(a)1(B)
The Original Bomb Pop v The Original Firecracker Pop
SDNY
http://t.co/jIuviIUycu
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 25, 2015
Recent Trademark Decisions
"No coherent recitation of facts"
http://t.co/2QXBasU5ru
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 25, 2015
ND CAL:
WII PLAY MOTION not counterfeit of PLAYMOTION!
http://t.co/6dnK4Kjper
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 25, 2015
BAD SPANIELS v JACK DANIELS
(another dog parody)
Discussion of DJ Pltf defining Def's trade dress http://t.co/8lVUSteT64
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 25, 2015



