“Lawyer Marc Randazza sues detractor in bizarre case” says it all.
randazza v cox
var docstoc_docid=”137170690″;var docstoc_title=”randazza v cox”;var docstoc_urltitle=”randazza v cox”;
“Lawyer Marc Randazza sues detractor in bizarre case” says it all.
randazza v cox
var docstoc_docid=”137170690″;var docstoc_title=”randazza v cox”;var docstoc_urltitle=”randazza v cox”;
TREK bikes sues Subaru over CROSSTREK car.
trek v crosstrek
var docstoc_docid=”137168214″;var docstoc_title=”trek v crosstrek”;var docstoc_urltitle=”trek v crosstrek”;
EBay seller moves for declaratory judgment against Coalition to Advance the Protection of Sports Logos (CAPS).
sirabella v caps
var docstoc_docid=”137096492″;var docstoc_title=”sirabella v caps”;var docstoc_urltitle=”sirabella v caps”;
CAPS letter
var docstoc_docid=”137096541″;var docstoc_title=”CAPS letter”;var docstoc_urltitle=”CAPS letter”;
Report on Copyright Law, by Republican Study Committee, withdrawn. Coverage here and here.
withdrawn republican copyright study
var docstoc_docid=”136440998″;var docstoc_title=”withdrawn republican copyright study”;var docstoc_urltitle=”withdrawn republican copyright study”;
Producers of The Hobbit sue low-budget film AGE OF THE HOBBITS. One does not simply use the name HOBBIT in a title. Complaint (in two parts) is fun reading. Coverage here.
You know what would be an interesting trademark fact pattern – a documentary about Homo floresiensis.
hobbit complaint
var docstoc_docid=”136168732″;var docstoc_title=”hobbit complaint”;var…
Village Voice owns local newspapers in various cities. They offer ‘incentive/promotional programs’ to local establishments under the BEST OF mark as In BEST OF DALLAS, BEST OF DENVER, etc. Yelp, the local review/directory site/app is allegedly using many of the same marks.
village voice v yelp
var docstoc_docid=”134291284″;var docstoc_title=”village voice v yelp”;var docstoc_urltitle=”village voice v…
News Agency sues BuzzFeed for ‘scraping’ paparazzi shots. Gigaom commentary here.
mavrix v buzzfeed
var docstoc_docid=”133719234″;var docstoc_title=”mavrix v buzzfeed”;var docstoc_urltitle=”mavrix v buzzfeed”;
PUTT-PUTT is an incontestable trademark. Defendant’s Putt-Putt website here. Vintage Putt-Putt ad from here.
putt putt
var docstoc_docid=”133046081″;var docstoc_title=”putt putt”;var docstoc_urltitle=”putt putt”;
Not that this has ever happened with any of my clients, but there is a certain tendency to think that, in a coexistence agreement that allows the smaller company to continue use of the mark, but must obtain permission to modify its mark or vary its field of use, that the large company, once it…