hana modz v daily vape steals.pdf

var docstoc_docid=’171230730′; var docstoc_title=’hana modz v daily vape steals.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’hana modz v daily vape steals.pdf’;

The vape/e-cig market is producing two or three trademark cases a week. Here, the owner of BULL SMOKE sues VAPOR BULL. But what of BULL DURHAM?

bull smoke v vapor bull complaint.pdf

var docstoc_docid=’171111160′; var docstoc_title=’bull smoke v vapor bull complaint.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’bull smoke v vapor bull complaint.pdf’;

StarBuzz seeks declaration that its CITRUS MIST tobacco for hookahs (and e-cigs) doesn’t infringe Hershey’s CITRUS MIST mark used for breath-savers.

starbuzz v hershey citrus mist.pdf

var docstoc_docid=’170937010′; var docstoc_title=’starbuzz v hershey citrus mist.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’starbuzz v hershey citrus mist.pdf’;

Does anyone want to point to the best argument why a trademark office should accept only single class applications? Seems to needlessly drive up expenses in most instances.

Client had a bunch of applications published (in a country that isn’t the U.S.). The publication details on all of them were truncated due to a mistake by that country’s trademark office. We are advised that if allowed to issue, the resulting registrations are vulnerable to cancellation because of the incomplete publication (on the theory…

Guest post:
Peter Sloane
Partner, Leason Ellis LLP, White Plains, NY

Inside corporate counsel have plenty of work on their desks. The last thing they are looking for is yet more work. Still, trademarks and other intellectual property are increasingly important as corporate assets. Shareholders routinely consider the value of IP in assessing the strength…

You’d be surprised by how many trademark infringement suits involve hookahs. For example.

starbuzz tobacco.pdf

var docstoc_docid=’170422523′; var docstoc_title=’starbuzz tobacco.pdf’; var docstoc_urltitle=’starbuzz tobacco.pdf’;