Can I take your product and modify it so as to reach new audiences?  CleanFlicks “edits” out what it deems to be inappropriate material (i.e. sex and violence) and then rents or sells the edited version.  It argues that the First Amendment gives them the right to do so and filed a declaratory judgement action

Revelation, a small perfume company, apparently had senior rights to the mark TRUTH.  Calvin Klein bought the rights but allowed Revelation to continue using, and negotiated a trademark co-existence agreement dividing up distribution channels (Calvin Klein got the more expensive outlets).  However, TRUTH CALVIN KLEIN begain showing up in discount stores and Revelation sued

This occurred to me as I read of the various governmental resources being devoted to (1) promotion of digital television (which is properly the job of the market); and (2) hearings on P2P spoofing and hacking.

Instead, the resources would be better spent discussing a $200 tax credit for families and businesses that obtain broadband

Many U.S. trademark owners have successfully relied on Article 6bis of the Paris Convention in order to protect their famous trademark from piracy abroad.  The U.S., in my view, sometimes grants a narrower scope of protection than other countries in situations where it is obvious the U.S. applicant has adopted a non-US company’s trademark (see

UDRPLaw article on Go Daddy’s Domain By Proxy service, which allows the domain name registrant to keep his, her or its identity secret.  Great for limiting spam, that much harder to police the web. 

The inability to easily reconcile the domain name registrant’s privacy concerns with the public policy interest against anonymity in commerce