2016

wtr managing lifecycle 2016

I will be attending World Trademark Review’s conference on “Managing the Trademark Asset Lifecycle” in New York, on Thursday October 20, 2016.

The program covers:

– Brand and trademark audits;
– Brand valuation;
– Collateralization of brands;
– Financial and tax considerations of trademarks;
– Monetization (i.e. licensing);
– ‘Exit strategies’ (i.e. what to do

We need Men In Blazers to sort this one out. Allegations that employee of NYC bar stole FOOTBALL FACTORY trademark.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/09/football-factory-brief-1.pdf”]

oprah harpo own your power

Blogged previously here and here.

Plaintiff fails to establish protectability of OWN YOUR POWER, and likelihood of confusion arising from Oprah’s use on magazine cover and other usages.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/09/brown-v-winfrey-2d-cir-2016-1.pdf”]

107 page decision by Engelmeyer, J.

Plaintiff targets its LVL XIII (Level 13) sneaker at the luxury ($500) market. The sneaker has a metal toe plate with LVL XIII engraved on it:

-LXL-VIII

Plaintiff’s sneaker got some traction: a few celebrities were seen in a few pairs. 8 months after the introduction, LV comes out with

AA5 ARTS STAGE POSTER farmingdale live after five

Patchogue is about thirty minutes from Farmingdale on Long Island. Patchogue’s festivals are ALIVE AFTER FIVE and Farmingdale’s festivals are ALIVE AT FIVE.

[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2016/09/patchogue-v-farmingdale-alive-after-five-complaint-1.pdf”]

clear blue

Justia summary: Defendant, a marketer of over-the-counter pregnancy test kits, was found liable for false advertising in violation of section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a). Plaintiff, a leading competing marketer of over-the-counter pregnancy test kits, claimed that, in informing the user as to how long her pregnancy had been in effect,

Plaintiffs are 32 professional models. Defendant is a sex club in Miami. Plaintiffs alleges the sex club used their photographs to promote the club on websites and social media, without consent. The complaint contains Lanham False Advertising and various Florida state causes. Defendant moves to dismiss on various grounds but the court dismisses, sua sponte,