https://t.co/Mp0B5dZur7
Respondent's arguments re RDNH undercut by its criminal conviction#udrphttps://t.co/LYcr0U6soT

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 30, 2016

Did complainant jump into this FEETFIRST without thinking, or was it 'giving it a shot'? #udrphttps://t.co/lBKIL7EFII

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 30, 2016

FAKIR goes without prevailing in #UDRP re https://t.co/UZrEdjoAKQ https://t.co/lXdtCCIvER

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 30, 2016

https://t.co/uzIVSjjsve#UDRP panel doesn't know precisely what registrant is up to but it's up to no good https://t.co/jPFBhxn0a9

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) May 30, 2016