Skip to content

Menu

By Martin Schwimmer
HomeAbout
Contact
Search
Close

The Trademark Blog

The Trademark Blog

Published by Martin Schwimmer

Recent Decisions

By Marty Schwimmer on February 23, 2015
Posted in Uncategorized

Cal. law firm's website insufficient to create per. j. in Ga. FisherBROYLES, LLP v. JURIS LAW GROUP ND Georgia http://t.co/wpNYFcrRGx

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 23, 2015

When will corporate officer be personally liable? DAO TRAVELS v. CHARLESTON BLACK CAB, D. South Carolina http://t.co/IXG5k4CBTU

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 23, 2015

GARCINIA TRIM is descriptive for supplement containing Garcinia WISE SPORTS NUTRITION v. ISATORI, D. Colorado 2015 http://t.co/cFaANw7uL1

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 23, 2015

TOMAYDO-TOMAHHDO, LLC v. VOZARY, Discussion of copyrightability of recipes ND Ohio http://t.co/oLZHQhgciR

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 18, 2015

CAMOWRAPS v. QUANTUM DIGITAL, ED La Vicarious and contributory liability in Summary Judgment context http://t.co/olGPJONZfk

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015

2 of 2: Lyden v. ADIDAS AMERICA Patent owner attempts to use unconventional trademark to supplement patent rights http://t.co/qcQ0rU2LOP

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015

1 0f 2: The 'heel counter and spring element' in reg 3629011, claimed by plaintiff in "Lyden v adidas" http://t.co/YZVNkugE30

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015

DCS v. BELLA COLLINA EVENTS MD Fla Website's 'untargeted negligence' insufficient for pers. juris. in Fla. http://t.co/VA8BIcx4k4

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015

IFEBP v. Cottrell, D. Maryland Another decision applying Lexmark to 43(a)(1)(A) http://t.co/T2qn550c0Y

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 13, 2015

NUTRIBULLET v NUTRI NINJA: 'False reviews' are actionable, unfavorable comparison was true and is not actionable http://t.co/TXqERBB44Z

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015

Mon Cheri Bridals v John Does I think of these as 'quasi in-rems.' This is the 1st one I've seen in North Carolina http://t.co/EDq9P7qZ3e

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015

Candyland v Cornfields D Minn Example of negative puffery – pejorative statement that can't be proven false http://t.co/3utD6KTt2K

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015

Wilens v. AUTOMATTIC, Leave to serve by email, when ID of true defs is obscured by various means ND Cal http://t.co/1Se5HLHDN2

— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn

About the Author

Martin Schwimmer is a partner in Leason Ellis, an IP law boutique in White Plains, NY. His practice is concentrated in the area of U.S. and international trademark law and domain name counseling, prosecution and litigation.

Read More...

Stay Connected

Facebook RSS Twitter

Subscribe by Email

The Trademark Blog

Published by Martin Schwimmer of Leason Ellis
Facebook RSS Twitter
Leason Ellis
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer
Copyright © 2023, Martin Schwimmer. All Rights Reserved.
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo