Cal. law firm's website insufficient to create per. j. in Ga.
FisherBROYLES, LLP v. JURIS LAW GROUP ND Georgia
http://t.co/wpNYFcrRGx
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 23, 2015
When will corporate officer be personally liable?
DAO TRAVELS v. CHARLESTON BLACK CAB, D. South Carolina
http://t.co/IXG5k4CBTU
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 23, 2015
GARCINIA TRIM is descriptive for supplement containing Garcinia
WISE SPORTS NUTRITION v. ISATORI,
D. Colorado 2015
http://t.co/cFaANw7uL1
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 23, 2015
TOMAYDO-TOMAHHDO, LLC v. VOZARY,
Discussion of copyrightability of recipes
ND Ohio
http://t.co/oLZHQhgciR
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 18, 2015
CAMOWRAPS v. QUANTUM DIGITAL,
ED La
Vicarious and contributory liability in Summary Judgment context
http://t.co/olGPJONZfk
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015
2 of 2:
Lyden v. ADIDAS AMERICA
Patent owner attempts to use unconventional trademark to supplement patent rights
http://t.co/qcQ0rU2LOP
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015
1 0f 2:
The 'heel counter and spring element' in reg 3629011, claimed by plaintiff in "Lyden v adidas" http://t.co/YZVNkugE30
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015
DCS v. BELLA COLLINA EVENTS
MD Fla
Website's 'untargeted negligence' insufficient for pers. juris. in Fla.
http://t.co/VA8BIcx4k4
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 17, 2015
IFEBP v. Cottrell,
D. Maryland
Another decision applying Lexmark to 43(a)(1)(A)
http://t.co/T2qn550c0Y
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 13, 2015
NUTRIBULLET v NUTRI NINJA:
'False reviews' are actionable, unfavorable comparison was true and is not actionable
http://t.co/TXqERBB44Z
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015
Mon Cheri Bridals v John Does
I think of these as 'quasi in-rems.' This is the 1st one I've seen in North Carolina
http://t.co/EDq9P7qZ3e
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015
Candyland v Cornfields
D Minn
Example of negative puffery – pejorative statement that can't be proven false
http://t.co/3utD6KTt2K
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015
Wilens v. AUTOMATTIC,
Leave to serve by email, when ID of true defs is obscured by various means
ND Cal
http://t.co/1Se5HLHDN2
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) February 12, 2015