Filing at 7pm blew it
PAYCOM v. NFP
WD OK
This is a fact pattern where the DJ Pltf DOES NOT get choice of forum
http://t.co/WZdfpdF5BD
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) January 4, 2015
DENT DOCTOR v DENT CLINIC
ED Wisc
Def tries to buy its way out of injunction w/ sr. remote user license – nope
http://t.co/LtvJD1ZzyK
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) January 4, 2015
False Adv:
Paul Davis v Everett
ED Wisc
Def can't say Pltf is breaking the law even though Def thinks that it is
http://t.co/z1mSa988Bk
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) January 3, 2015
ANGRY BIRDS
Adams v. HARTZ MOUNTAIN CORPORATION
What 'including' means
http://t.co/zSC37wQj93
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) January 3, 2015
AFD CHINA v AFD CHINA
D Oregon
This may not have been an 'exceptional' case but it sounds like an unusual one
http://t.co/jeRvcrsc0g
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) January 3, 2015