The National Association of Secretaries of State is an organization of the Secretaries of State of the 50 states. They’re concerned that .INC, .LLC, .LLP or .CORP domains might be issued to entities that didn’t have those actual business registrations.
In 1998 there were various requests for comments with regard to increasing the name space.
et browne even tone
var docstoc_docid=”160349776″;var docstoc_title=”et browne even tone”;var docstoc_urltitle=”et browne even tone”;
Does linking to content infringe copyright?: http://t.co/IKJKlIOjGF (a post of mine at the @infolawgroup blog)
— Evan Brown (@internetcases) August 10, 2013
Lionsgate, Ex-Model Settle Feud Over 'Mad Men' Credits: Lionsgate Entertainment Corp. has settled a lawsuit wi… http://t.co/TUdiixSBYU
— IP Law News (@IP_Law_News) August 10, 2013
Photos of New York family taken through their
Rights Protection Mechanism (RPM) Requirements | ICANN http://t.co/vN4QPRyp0p
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 7, 2013
The Dotless Domain Name ( no TLD suffix) Study (Recommendations on pg. 14) | ICANN http://t.co/6Htfo7qIuh
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 6, 2013
High Risk of 'Name Collisions' in .HOME and .CORP | ICANN http://t.co/i8nM9BkIyq
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) August 6, 2013
Breaking:
Turns out that when India acceded to the Madrid Protocol on July 8 of this year, it elected to, per Article 14.5 of the Protocol, only accept extensions of International Registration that were created after July 8, which, on July 8, included zero percent of the world’s International Registrations (see the May 29 docs
Webb Law Firm of West Virginia seeks declaratory judgment against Webb Law Firm of Pennsylvania. Complaint gives the history of the Webbs of West Virginia. Also, ‘Country Roads’ is a West Virginia favorite.
webb v webb
var docstoc_docid=”160264704″;var docstoc_title=”webb v webb”;var docstoc_urltitle=”webb v webb”;
Justia summary: Plaintiffs filed suit under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq., against defendants, alleging trademark infringement based on a theory that defendants misappropriated and have unauthorized commercial use in the United States of certain United States-registered trademarks related to “Stolichnaya” – brand vodka (the “Marks”). At issue on appeal was whether
43(b)log: Keller v. EA: visual elements mean game isn’t protected by First Amendment:
“As the dissent pointed out, “[t]he logical consequence of the majority view is that all realistic depictions of actual persons, no matter how incidental, are protected by a state law right of publicity regardless of the creative context. This logic jeopardizes
From Prof Goldman’s Tech & Marketing Law Blog, a guest post by Prof Tyler Ochoa: Rationalizing (?) the Hart and Keller v. EA Sports Publicity Rights Rulings
Prof Goldman’s Intro:
“It does a great job demonstrating that the interplay between the First Amendment and the publicity rights is completely anarchy, which isn’t surprising given
TV Station Issues DMCA Takedowns On Videos Of Its Fake Asian Pilot Names Debacle | Techdirt http://t.co/eHgirPx2iI
— TrademarkBlog (@TrademarkBlog) July 29, 2013
Need to explain the new gTLD program to someone? Materials, factsheets & more available here: http://t.co/eRvJZ6f3wT #NewgTLDs #ICANN
— ICANN (@NewgTLDsICANN) July 29, 2013
Precedential No. 31: TTAB Dismisses U. Alabama Opposition