Plaintiff Charriol
hired defendant A’lor to manufacture jewelry. Plaintff alleges passing off and seeks TRO. SD Cal denies, as plaintiff did not comply with TRO pleading requirements, making only conclusory allegations that defendant would melt the jewelry and destroy its records if notified.

charriol v alor
var docstoc_docid=”158791782″;var docstoc_title=”charriol v alor”;var docstoc_urltitle=”charriol v alor”;