Copyfight is provoking me, in a friendly way, to comment on the proposed dilution revision bill. EFF is soliciting opposition to the bill. I honestly have been too wrapped up with client work to comment meaningfully.
My initial reaction to EFF’s hypo regarding UPS suing Brown’s Record Store may be off the mark,. UPS’s rights are in the color brown as applied to clothes and to vehicles, but its word marks are THE AMAZING COLOR BROWN and WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU (I based this on a review of UPS’ trademark list on its website), neither of which would give much traction here. I’m therefore a little skeptical that UPS could or would go after BROWN’S RECORD STORE (or DR BROWN’S CEL RAY TONIC).
But UPS can plausibly say that a brown delivery truck signifies UPS as source.
So what should be the result if:
1. FedEx painted its trucks ‘UPS Brown’ but left FEDEX on them.
2. FlyByNight Courier used UPS Brown trucks.
3. Your pizza place used UPS Brown trucks.