philbricks.gif
Plaintiff, Daniel Philbrick, or affiliated companies or predecessors in interest operate various businesses in the sports field under the name PHILBRICK’S SPORTS or variants thereof, since 1983. He used the domain name PHILBRICKSSPORTS.COM and others. Defendant eNom (a registar) obtained the domain name PHILBRICKSPORTS.COM (one S) and several others, and ran keyword ads relating to

I’m quoted in today’s BNA Electronic Commerce & Law Report: “Celebrity Names Disputes Under UDRP: Challenges, Contours, Likely Outcomes,” 14 ECLR 256, 2/25/09 (no link, walled garden).
While we’re talking about celebrity name disputes, I was once copied on an email that Catherine Zeta-Jones was copied on as well. I’m not lying.

This is a fairly complex fact pattern. Defendants may have hacked plaintiff’s website, stole its code, stole its domain names, set up a counterfeit website, sent a bad faith DMCA notice against plaintiff, forged asset transfer documents, and did other bad things. Plaintiff brings trademark, copyright, in rem ACPA and other assorted causes of action.