<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Trademark Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/temp/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2006</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 11:32:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=3.2</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Colbert on YouTube: No Conspiracy Theory</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Video of Stephen Colbert saying that the emperor and the emperor's press corps have no clothes was stored on YouTube.  When reports that C-Span had asked YouTube to pull the clip on copyright grounds, there were, among others, two reactions: (1) how can a government claim copyrights; and (2) did they do so to suppress the speech.</p>

<p>To answer the first - it turns out that <a href="http://www.c-span.org/">C-Span</a> is not a government entity.  It is a not-for-profit entity established by the cable industry and certainly own and assert copyright.  As for conspiracy theories, <a href="http://www.cspan.org/Search/advanced.asp?AdvancedQueryText=stephen+colbert&StartDateMonth=&StartDateYear=&EndDateMonth=&EndDateYear=&Series=&ProgramIssue=&QueryType=&QueryTextOptions=&ResultCount=10&SortBy=bestmatch">C-Span itself is distributing the clip.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/colbert_on_yout.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/colbert_on_yout.html</guid>
         <category>Copyright</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 11:32:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Stoller Promotes Tuesday Night Blog Party In Toronto</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, <a href="http://rentmark.blogspot.com/2006/05/john-l-welch-and-marty-schwimmer-go-to.html">here.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/stoller_promote.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/stoller_promote.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellany</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 11:22:51 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>If You Know Where There&apos;s Open WiFi In Toronto . .</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>. . . near the conference, email me at marty at schwimmerlegal dot com and I will post the location.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/if_you_know_whe.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/if_you_know_whe.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellany</category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 06:41:34 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WSJ:  Can Lawyer&apos;s Copy One Another&apos;s Litigation Documents?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>WSJ: <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2006/05/04/can-lawyers-copy-one-anothers-litigation-documents/">Can Lawyers Copy One Another's Litigation Documents?<br />
</a></p>

<p>Trademark Blog post from November 2002 on the issue <a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/archives/2002/11/plaintiff_state.html">here.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/wsj_can_lawyers.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/wsj_can_lawyers.html</guid>
         <category>Copyright</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 14:46:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Double the Centigrade And Add Thirty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Double the centigrade and add thirty in order to convert centigrade to farenheit.</p>

<p>One US dollar is worth approximately 1.10 Canadian, one Canadian dollar is worth approximately 90 cents.</p>

<p>Take a passport or birth certificate.</p>

<p>They speak English, but with an accent.</p>

<p>Your cell phone provider may treat all your calls as roaming, it depends on your plan.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/double_the_cent.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/double_the_cent.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellany</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 May 2006 10:24:35 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Pitch Me In Toronto</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Reminder: The Ale and Quail Club of Mid to-Upper-Westchester will be hosting its annual social at:</p>

<p>BeerBistro<br />
18 King Street (at Yonge)<br />
Toronto</p>

<p>Tuesday May 9 - 9:30 pm to Midnight</p>

<p>All constructive suggestions on how to improve the Trademark Blog will be cheerfully entertained.  If you would like to meet with me in Toronto but are intimidated by throngs of rowdy trademark lawyers clutching the latest Thomson and Thomson giveaway, email me at marty at schwimmerlegal dot com.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/pitch_me_in_tor.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/pitch_me_in_tor.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellany</category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 11:57:23 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>DONALD TRUMP v. IVANA TRUMP</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Via The Smoking Gun, we learn that <a href="http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0503062trump1.html?link=rssfeed">The Donald is opposing his ex-wife Ivana's trademark application for IVANA TRUMP.</a>  You'd have thought the divorce settlement would have envisioned this.  HT Eric.</p>

<p>Possibly relevant Trademark Blog post from 2002 on the '<a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/archives/2002/08/who_is_the_real.html">sacred right to use one's own name</a>.'  There's a typo in it that I can no longer correct.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/donald_trump_v.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/donald_trump_v.html</guid>
         <category>Surname</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 15:39:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Backdoor or &quot;Third Shift&quot; Counterfeits</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>IP Dragon links to <a href="http://ipdragon.blogspot.com/2006/05/new-balance-and-third-shift-or-how-to.html">Forbes article and comments on New Balance's experiences with unauthorized production by authroized manufacturers</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/backdoor_or_thi.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/backdoor_or_thi.html</guid>
         <category>Counterfeits</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 14:21:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Video Illustrating Google Adword Abuse</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/results?search=adword+abuse&search_type=search_videos&search=Search">Video distributed in YouTube illustrating adword abuse </a>(worth the 9 minutes).</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/video_illustrat.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/video_illustrat.html</guid>
         <category>Search Engines</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:28:42 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>WaPo Article on Google and Parked Domains</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Washington Post: <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/29/AR2006042900279.html">The Web's Million-Dollar Typos</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/wapo_article_on.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/wapo_article_on.html</guid>
         <category>Domain Names</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:21:39 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Class Action Suit Against Yahoo For &apos;Syndication Fraud&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Text of Complaint in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/technology/documents/yahoo_may2006.pdf">Crafts by Veronica v. Yahoo</a>, filed in the District Court of New Jersey on Monday.</p>

<p>Washington Post coverage <a href="http://blog.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/05/class_action_targets_yahoo_ove_1.html">here</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/class_action_su.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/class_action_su.html</guid>
         <category>Search Engines</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 10:11:48 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>MY, YOUR and OUR</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>NY Times article on <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/02/business/media/02adco.html?_r=1&oref=slogin">the use of MY, YOUR and OUR in branding campaigns.</a></p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/my_your_and_our.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/my_your_and_our.html</guid>
         <category>Branding</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 09:22:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Counterfeit Chic: &apos;Knockoff News&apos;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Counterfeit Chic: '<a href="http://www.counterfeitchic.com/2006/05/knockoff_news_16.php">Knockoff News</a>'</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/counterfeit_chi.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/counterfeit_chi.html</guid>
         <category>Counterfeits</category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2006 09:18:19 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Let&apos;s Open This To The Floor Re 43(c)(4) Defenses</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Referring to previous posts <a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/archives/2006/04/does_the_43c_re.html">here</a> and <a href="http://www.schwimmerlegal.com/archives/2006/04/aipla_on_the_su.html">here,</a> the Public Citizen has been disputing INTA and AIPLA as to the effect of language in the DIlution Revision Bill.  Its latest memo is <a href="http://www.citizen.org/documents/ResponsetoAIPLAon43(a).pdf">here</a>.</p>

<p>We're taking comments from the floor on the following questions:</p>

<p>1.  Does the use of 'section' rather than subsection in the current 43(c)(4) imply that Congress intended for the enumerated defenses in that clause extend to all causes in Section 43 and not just 43(c);</p>

<p>2.  If the answer to question 1 is yes, would amending 'section' to specific references to dilution in 43(c)(4) have the effect of removing the enumerated defenses from section 43(a) and 43(d);</p>

<p>3.  If the answer to question 1 is yes, would removing those references to dilution in the proposed bill and maintaining the word 'section' have the effect of explicitly extending those defenses to 43(a) and 43(d)?</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/05/lets_open_this.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/05/lets_open_this.html</guid>
         <category>What Is This Thing Called Dilution?</category>
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 09:41:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Trademark Blog Live In Toronto Tuesday May 9</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>IP Bloggers TTABlog, IPKAt and yours truly will be hosting a get-together Tuesday night, May 9, 9:30, at the BeerBistro (several blocks from the Conference hotel).</p>

<p>Come before, during or after the Thompson and Thompson event, for a little quiet time.  Share your favorite Stoller story, volunteer to become a country correspondent for the Trademark Blog, get John Welch's autograph, dance on a table, have too many beers and disclose confidential information - all in good fun.</p>

<p>BEERBISTRO<br />
18 King Street East (at Yonge Street)<br />
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1C4</p>

<p><a href="http://www.google.com/maps?hl=en&lr=&safe=off&q=beer+bistro&near=Toronto,+ON,+Canada&radius=0.0&amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;amp;cid=43723057,-79392486,12601999917602616805&li=lmd&om=1&ll=43.650733,-79.3771&spn=0.01652,0.034418">Map to BeerBistro</a>.</p>]]></description>
         <link>/temp/archives/2006/04/trademark_blog_10.html</link>
         <guid>/temp/archives/2006/04/trademark_blog_10.html</guid>
         <category>Miscellany</category>
         <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 14:14:45 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
