From the Wiki entry for Scotch Whiskey:
" [T]he Scotch Whisky Order of 1990 which clarified the Scotch Whisky Act of 1988, and mandates that the spirit:
Must be distilled at a Scottish distillery from water and malted barley, to which only other whole grains may be added, have been processed at that distillery into a mash, converted to a fermentable substrate only by endogenous enzyme systems, and fermented only by the addition of yeast,
Must be distilled to an alcoholic strength of less than 94.8% by volume so that it retains the flavour of the raw materials used in its production,
Must be matured in Scotland in oak casks for not less than three years, and
Must not contain any added substance other than water and caramel colour."
If it doesn't meet these criteria, then it may not be called Scotch Whiskey.
The Delhi Court has now ruled that, pursuant to India's obligations under TRIPS, that a name may not otherwise suggest a Scottish origin, as it recently prohibited the use of RED SCOT.
China Daily: "Luxury Brands Win Trademark Lawsuit" (Prada, Louis Vuitton, Chanel, Gucci and Burberry win $2500 each from market selling counterfeits).
This Channelnewsasia.com article reports that WIPO has announced a revised Trademark Law Treaty, to be named the Singapore Treaty, after the location of the recent conference. No announcement on the WIPO site yet. Background here.
IPKat on the possibly descriptive, possible disparaging mark NOT MADE IN CHINA, filed for in the EEC. The article cited by IPKat reports that the same applicant, Alvito, filed in the U.S. but was rejected. This may not be correct, as I found three pending design applications by Alvito for that mark, all of which have not yet been examined. However a different entity has filed in the U.S. for NOT MADE IN CHINA as well, and it received a preliminary geographical descriptiveness objection. Several registrations contain the words MADE IN CHINA, and have disclaimed that term.
UPDATE: TTABlog on a prior TTAB decision on NOT MADE IN FRANCE.
Cory Doctorow on the Canadian Red Cross policing the RED CROSS symbol.

IPKat on Estate of Picasso failing to block applicaton for PICARO for vehicles (prevailing party depicted above).
IPOD v. SPODRADIO in Germany, via The Alarm Clock, hat tip Jay. Bonus reference to Caveman Lawyer in article.
Amsterdam District Court holds that Armani shoe infringes Jan Jansen's 'Tutti Piedi.' Via Lovell's IP Newsletter (containing photo of both shoes).
Starbucks prevails in China against infringer, via a new blog from the WSJ named, LAW BLOG, with free Eddie Murphy reference.
and therefore the New Zealand Rugby Union cannot register it as a trademark. Via stuff.co.nz.
Vodafone goes after name squatter in Russia.
Similar story re STARBUCKs in Russia here.

Wilkinson and Gillette litigate: 'A Competitive Edge In A Cutthroat Market' via BrandChannel.
Additionally commentary from The Onion here (hat tip Douglas).
Bloomberg LP apparently uses the trademark PENGBO in China. It has sued two Chinese companies for using that mark. The article doesn't explain why Bloomberg uses that trademark.
This may be completely missing the issue in this case, but some Western companies use neither a translation nor a transliteration (characters that produce the phonetic equivalent of the name) in China, but use a connotative equivalent. If you have insight on the Bloomberg situation, pass it along.
OHIM confirms FIFA World Cup Trademarks. Via Sportsbusiness.com.
Prior discussion of case by Lovells here.
From Friday's Wall Street Journal (sorry, I'm running behind), an article (no free online version available) entitled 'China's Logo Crackdown,' discussing the absence of infringements of the logo for the 2008 Beijing Olympics. The question is raised: if China can effectively stop the infringement of one trademark, can it effectively stop the infringement of other trademarks.
Starbucks prevented from expanding into Russia due to trademark cybersquatter. Via The Age.
Discussion of protection of famous marks in Russia by Starbuck's attorney.
Reuters reports that Google will stop using GMAIL and will instead use GOOGLEMAIL in the UK, as a result of a trademark protest from an owner of prior rights in the term.
I will subtly point out here that our firm performs trademark clearance searches and provides availability opinions for the U.S. and abroad, working with a network of international attorneys.
New Zealand trademark owner of ART ATTACK receives windfall. Via NewsTalk ZB.