If you got that right, you may be needed to testify as to secondary meaning. Story regarding the trademark suit here.
Update: WSJ Lw Blog points out that it woudl be great to attend a hearing in this suit, so that you can hear the judges and lawyers repeat the line over and over again.
Seattle Trademark Lawyer: “No Secondary Meaning for Color Mark Means No Enforceable Trademark Rights”
This Ninth Circuit decision on the word ‘DISINFECTABLE” ends with a flourish.
More about The Big Game here. Background about the NFL’s published application for The Big Game here.
The latest INTA Bulletin arrived. Highlights include an illustation of a fishing line guide (discussion of the registrability of same in this decision), report of Dutch case involving the Adidas three-stripe mark, and news of a famous mark decision from Poland (LEXUS).
Slashdot makes the point that several companies would gladly trade places with Apple and its classy problem regarding PODCAST.