Fish IP Law firm seeks declaratory judgment against Fish and Richardson.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/fish-v-fish-1.pdf”]
Fish IP Law firm seeks declaratory judgment against Fish and Richardson.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/fish-v-fish-1.pdf”]
Photographer sues model, Gigi Hadid, for uploading copyrighted photo to her Instagram page. As an aside, note alteration of ADIDAS to HADID.
Case was filed in ED of Virginia. Plaintiff’s lawyer is from there, and that’s pretty much it.
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/09/cepeda-v-hadid-1.pdf”]
See here for my prior post, including the text of the Dr Phil copyright fair use decision.
Re-cap: defendant was suing TV’s Dr. Phil in state court for torts arising from his allegedly abusive behavior. In order to show that Dr. Phil is someone who shouts, defendant, a former employee, obtained access to archival…
Former employee of TV’s Dr Phil brings a state suit alleging various torts (including infliction of emotional distress). Seeking to document his abusive behavior, the defendant uses her iPhone to copy nine seconds of Dr. Phil archival footage, showing Dr Phil (allegedly) behaving badly in another incident, and seeks to use the clip as evidence.…
Plaintiff Jetmax asserts copyright in ‘an ornamental light set comprised of a series of molded, decorative tear shaped covered lights with a wire frame over the covers.”
Defendant Advance, “produced the allegedly infringing product., which ‘has a teardrop shaped plastic cover with eight sets of double grooves, as well as a decorative wire frame containing…
. . . is too long.
monk's family sues over name/image used on brother thelonious belgian style abbey ale. cc @zahr_said & @linfordinfo https://t.co/3qgDzq4Jnp pic.twitter.com/JpGPVwYwSW
— alexandra j. roberts (@lexlanham) September 1, 2017
[Eugene Volokh] Pseudonymous litigation, and alleged skulduggery in the world of romance novelists https://t.co/vnWECyj6TA pic.twitter.com/L4ZqBo15ZB
— Volokh Conspiracy (@VolokhC) September 1, 2017
Only 16% of people correctly recall
…
This case, American Cruise Line v HMS American SteamBoat Queen, seems to suggest that it can be. I believe there are other cases that suggest otherwise (GoPets v. Hise).
[embeddoc url=”https://www.schwimmerlegal.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/833/2017/08/AmericanCruiseLinesHMSAmericanQueenSteamboat20170816-1.pdf”]