3
Oct/13
Exxon Interlocking Xs v FXX Interlocking Xs
Exxon sues Fox over Fox’ new FXX Network logo. The complaint speaks for itself. Note, however, that likelihood of being reminded of something is not the same thing as likelihood of being confused. Of course, there are those who believe that likelihood of being reminded of something is likelihood of dilution.
One response to “Exxon Interlocking Xs v FXX Interlocking Xs”
- 2(a) False Connection
- abandoment
- Abandonment / Residual Goodwill
- Advertising
- Affirmative Defenses
- Ambush Marketing
- Appellations of Origin
- arbitration
- Artistic Relevance
- Background Use
- Bait and Switch
- Blockchain
- Brand Protection
- Branding
- But Is It Art?
- CFAA
- Channels of trade
- Circuit Court Decisions
- Claim Preclusioon
- Class Action
- Clickwrap
- Commercial Speech
- Compatibility / Replacement Parts
- Concurrent Use
- Contracts
- Contributory/Vicarious Liability
- Copyright
- Copyright Fair Use
- copyright preclusion
- Corporate Names
- Coulrophobia
- Counterfeits
- Cybersquatting
- Damages
- Dastar
- Dawn Of The Donut
- Decaratory Judgement
- Deceptive Trade Practices
- Defenses
- Desing Patent
- Digital Rights Management
- Distinctiveness
- DMCA
- Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents
- Domain Names
- eBay Merc
- Economics of Trademarks
- Esso
- Ethics Professional Responsibility
- EULA
- Exceptional Case
- Extraterritorial Application
- False Advertising
- False Endorsement
- Famous Marks
- Fashion
- FDA
- Fees and Costs
- FIFRA
- First Amendment
- Forum Non Conveniens
- Franchise
- FRE 408
- Functionality
- General blogging affairs
- Genericide
- Geography
- Grey Goods
- Hot News / Misappropriation
- House Mark
- Ideas, Protection of
- in rem
- Inherent Registrability
- Initial Interest Confusion
- Insurance
- International
- Irony
- irreparable harm – eBay
- Legislation
- Lexmark
- Libel/Defamation
- Likelihood of Confusion
- Linking
- Lionel Hutz
- Litigation
- Logos
- Madrid Protocol
- Miscellany
- Mootness
- Motion to Transfer
- Motion Trademarks
- Music Copyright
- Naked License
- Natural
- New TLDs
- Nominative Fair Use
- Non Disclosure
- Non-Traditional Trademarks
- Octane
- Olympics
- Open Source
- Other People's Mail
- Pan American Convention
- Paris Convention
- Parody/Speech
- Personal Jurisdiction
- Pleading
- Podcasting
- pom wonderful
- Post purchase confusion
- preclusion
- Priority
- Protection of Data
- Public Domain
- Publicity Rights
- Recently Filed Suits
- Redskins Trademark
- Relatedness of goods
- Releases
- Res Judicata
- Restraining Order re Assets
- Reverse Confusion
- Right of Publicity/Privacy
- RSS and Data Aggregation
- Rule 11
- Rule 12(b)(6)
- Rule 15
- Russia
- Sanctions
- SCA
- Scandalous and Immoral!
- School Names
- Scope
- SDNY
- SDNY Procedure
- Search Engines
- Server Test / embedding
- Service of Process
- Shapes
- Similarity of Logos
- Slogans / Ornamental Use
- Smart Supply Chain
- State Trademarks
- Stoller
- Store Communications Act
- Surname
- Surveys
- Tatoos
- THe Sacred Right to One's Name
- Third Party Practice
- TITWIITWTW
- Trade Dress
- Trade Libel
- Trade Secret
- Trademark Fair Use
- Trademark Practice
- Trademark Trolls
- Trespass to Chattels
- TTAB Filings
- UDRP
- Uncategorized
- User Generated Content
- Venue
- Vexatious Litigation
- Video Games
- Virtual Worlds
- What Is This Thing Called Dilution?
- YouTube
fat chance, Exxon.