10
Sep/11

Twitter v Twittad re Registration For TWEETS


Twitter attempted to register the mark TWEETS and it was blocked by defendant’s registration for: LET YOUR AD MEET TWEETS.  Twitter moves in district court to cancel the registration.  There is no infringement cause.

 Complaint Twitter Meet Tweets

Filed under: Uncategorized


8
Sep/11

My Summer Vacation: Arsenal v Manchester United


I took my family to the Arsenal-Manchester United game in Manchester:

Before the game, we went to the Man Utd megastore in the stadium:

I bought my wife a Man Utd red devil hat because it was so cold:

Outside Old Trafford (Man Utd’s stadium) there were vendors selling ‘game day’ scarves:

The vendors stood just outside this sign:

We got this one for my son the Arsenal fan, so that he could covertly root for them (our tickets forbade us from overtly rooting for Arsenal, because we were in a Man Utd section. Serious.):

Let’s take a look at the scarf more closely.  Here is the Man Utd side:

First, it uses the word UNITED alone.  UNITED is a common term for soccer teams.  Also, take a look at that crest:

This is Man Utd’s ‘real’ crest:

The logo has no use of the word MANCHESTER or the Red Devil mascot, and the ship is somewhat different.  There is a reference instead to the ‘Red Army’, the fans of Man Utd.  Now let’s turn to the Arsenal side of the scarf:

I suppose one would argue that it doesn’t literally depict the word ARSENAL, substituting a cannon for the letter R.  Of course a similar looking cannon is part of the present ARSENAL logo, seen here on the right, depicted next to its pre-2002 logo:

Now take a look at the crest from the scarf:

First, you’ll note that the scarf uses a ‘throwback’ capital A, as used in the former ARSENAL logo shown to the left above.  Also, the term GOONERS is used.  Arsenal team members are the GUNNERS and their fans are the GOONERS.  HOWEVER, Arsenal owns a UK registration for GOONER.  I wrote a column about trademarks that refer to fans of a sports team, rather than to the sports teams themselves, a while back.

As  a parting shot, I note that the scarf depicts the term PREMIERSHIP.  The EPL is known now as the BARCLAY’s PREMIER LEAGUE.  However it was previously named the Premiership (and is still referred to as such – and Barclay’s (and the FA) own registrations that include the term.

Final tally: at least two reproductions of registered marks or words, and a lot of references to registered marks.

Does the scarf suggest on its face that it is ‘from’ or ‘authorized’ by Man Utd and Arsenal or that it is ‘about’ the game between Man Utd and Arsenal (or both or neither)?

I will leave the UK lawyers to come to conclusions about whether this is infringement under UK law.

I will add the following.  Do potential customers think these scarves are ‘authorized’?  What did my son think? Well, he was the only thirteen year old who bought the scarf on advice of counsel, so he doesn’t count, but he ordinarily wouldn’t care; he wanted a souvenir that he was there, and the scarf was that.  What did the fans think? Well, the sign put paid on that question.

If you’re interested in these issues, a good place to start is Arsenal v Reed.

Let’s not discuss the actual outcome of the game.  Let’s just say that Arsenal was Tottenham in disguise.

 

 

 

Filed under: Uncategorized


7
Sep/11

I Will Be Speaking On the New TLDs In Stamford, CT, Tuesday September 13


My partner Yuval Marcus and I will be participating in a panel on domain names and online trademark enforcement at a presentation from Westchester-Fairfield chapter of ACCA, in Stamford, CT, Tuesday September 13:

THE LATEST LEGAL STRATEGIES FOR
o PROTECTING and PROMOTING YOUR TRADEMARKS ONLINE,
o ONLINE ENFORCEMENT
o SOCIAL MEDIA, KEY WORD ADVERTISING and
o THE NEW “.brand” DOMAIN NAME TLDs

Moderator: Colm Dobbyn, MasterCard Worldwide

1. Domain Name Enforcement – Sean Merrill, General Electric
2. Trademark Infringement Online – Jennifer Millones, Diageo
3. Online Counterfeiting and Trademark Infringement in Social Media– Laura Protzmann, The Dannon Company
4. Update on Keyword Advertising – Yuval Marcus, Leason Ellis
5. The NewDomain Name gTLDS – Marty Schwimmer, Leason Ellis & Gretchen Olive, CSC
**********
8:30 AM Registration. CLE 9AM-12
3 Prof. Practice Transitional-Non-Transitional NY CLE
At: Kelley Drye’s Conference Space, 400 Atlantic St., Stamford
___________________________________________

An online presence is essential for a brand owner today, regardless of whether it conducts e-commerce. Brand owners are confronted with online challenges daily, and attempting to stop them often feels like playing Whac-A-Mole®, where successful enforcement action is often followed by multiple new infringements.

A panel of experienced in-house and law firm trademark counsel will share their insights and best practices on how to create and implement an online enforcement strategy that is cost effective and produces results. In addition, the program will include a discussion of the implications of the January 2012 application for new gTLD domain names, expected to feature, for example, ‘dot brands,’ and ‘dot keywords.’
In this program you will learn:

• How to optimize your anti-infringement strategy and taking down infringing products from e-commerce sites such as eBay and Alibaba;
• Strategies for pursuing the new TLDs;
• What to do when a competitor purchases your company’s trademarks as keywords for internet advertising campaigns;
• Tips and techniques on how to effectively manage your company’s domain name portfolio; and
• Brand protection techniques for social media.

Cost: $50 for Members & their in-house/sponsor colleagues if paid by 9/7/11; $70 thereafter Paralegals: Subtract $10 for foregoing. Non-Members: Add $20 to member rates


 Directions to be emailed to attendees.


 WESFACCA is an accredited NY CLE Provider. Information on financial assistance available on request. Refunds with 48 notice of cancellation.


 **************************************************************************


To RESERVE FOR SEPTEMBER 13 IP SEMINAR at Kelley Drye, Stamford
- Fax to 203 329 0825 or email to [email protected]

Filed under: Uncategorized


7
Sep/11

ZeeRay v Airwick re Air Freshener Trade Dress


Zeeray sues Airwick claiming trade dress in ‘drop of liquid’ or ‘drop of juice’ hanging air fresheners.

 Complaint Sdny Juice Airwick Trade Dress

 

Filed under: Uncategorized


7
Sep/11

REGISTERED AGENTS, LTD. v REGISTERED AGENT, INC.


Plaintiff has an incontestable registration for REGISTERED AGENTS, LTD. covering filing and retrieval of incorporation and corporate documents with government agencies.
Complaint Registered Agents Ltd Delaware