February 2011

Detail from display in Niketown in Manhattan.

From the complaint: Plaintiff Swatch, a Swiss publicly traded company, hosted a conference call for securities analysts. The call was transmitted and recorded by a conference call service. Participants were instructed not to record the call for publication or broadcast. Bloomberg News was not invited or authorized to participate in the call. Bloomberg recorded the

The NY Times ran an article today on KENNEDY FRIED CHICKEN . There was an original KENNEDY FRIED CHICKEN in Brooklyn and it spend its early years being sued by KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, That dispute ended when KFC became KFC. While the owner of the original Kennedy’s now owns federal trademark registration 2994240, the name

Odd. Defendant allegedly sells Chanel fragrances without the outer packaging, without cellophane wrapping, with the laser-etched batch code scratched off, in an unmarked cardboard lining held together by rubber bands or clear adhesive tape. That doesn’t seem like the best way to sell Chanel.

Complaint Chanel Ok Perfume

The Game, featuring Fifty Cent, released “How We Do” in 2005. Plaintiffs registered copyright for their song ‘Elevator” in 2002. Both songs are described as contemporary hip hop songs. Both songs’ choruses contain the phrase “this is how we do” four times, interspersed with other lines, set to a similar rhythm.

A copyright plaintiff must

A defendant’s counterclaims can act as a bear trap for plaintiff, keeping it in a case that it wishes to unilaterally drop.

Plaintiff sues defendant alleging trademark infringement of a registration described as a ‘design’ or ‘configuration’ mark. Defendant files answers and counterclaims seeking declaratory judgement cancelling registration. During discovery, plaintiff delivers uni-lateral covenant not

Yahoo! alleges that defendant committed trademark infringement by sending fake ltotery spam.  Defendant brings counterclaim alleging that (1) he didn’t commit infringement; (2) therefore he is being defamed.  Yahoo! moves to dismiss counterclaim.  Court notes in decisding Yahoo’s motion to dismiss it must treat non-moving party’s factual allegations as true, not its legal conclusions.  Even