31
Jan/11

Ceci N’est Pas un Birkin Bag


ha!.  I would have to believe that this fact pattern has to have happened before in the history of the world, but I don’t know about it.  Thursday Friday puts a picture of an Hermes Birkin bag on a $35 tote, as ‘an anti-status symbol.’   “My other car is a . . . ” Times coverage here (I stole the headline from them).

A $30 Rolex? Post-purchase confusion?  Tarnishment or Chewy Vuitton? Jelly Kelly redux?  No copyright cause in the complaint btw.

Another case of coulrophobia in the offing.

HT Amanda.

Complaint Hermes Birkin Thursday Friday

Filed under: Uncategorized
2 Comments
  • http://twitter.com/actualconfusion Actual Confusion

    Thanks for sharing this Marty. I think this is a really clever Chewy Vuitton redo. I doubt the Court should find that anyone would be truly confused by a tote bag with a picture of the bag, as one coming from Uber-elite Hermes.

    Interesting to see what happens though.

  • R Piercearrow

    Unfortunately for the defendant, Magritte is not binding precedent.