Hearts on Fire v Blue Nile re Keywords
Hearts on Fire alleges that Blue Nile purchased 'hearts on file' as keyword, and used that term in the text of its ads, but does not offer HEARTS ON FIRE diamonds.
« "Tyson Faces Second False Advertising Suit Over 'Antibiotic Free' Claims" | Main | "ICANN Opens Up Pandora's Box Of New TLDs" »
Hearts on Fire alleges that Blue Nile purchased 'hearts on file' as keyword, and used that term in the text of its ads, but does not offer HEARTS ON FIRE diamonds.