« September 2004 | Main | November 2004 »

October 29, 2004

Homeland Security Agents Going After Infringing Goods?

Read this entire story below from The Oregonian, about Department of Homeland Security agents objecting to the sale of toys in a toy store in Oregon, on intellectual property grounds.  The article is a little vague about distingushing between Customs and non-Customs DHS agents and I'm a little puzzled as to what really happened.  U.S. Customs, which is now part of the Department of Homeland Security, does have an intellectual property division and does have the power to seize allegedly infringing items at the time of importation.  Federal marshalls are sometimes enlisted to aid in the seizure of counterfeit items which have already been imported.  This doesn't appear to be either situation.  Also, it seems that the goods weren't seized, merely taken off the shelf.  The story is odd: if you have additional information, please send it in.


Update: One seasoned litigator notes that if 'Customs' was substituted for 'DHS' in the article, then the story would merely be unusual.  Customs agents are sometimes involved in post-importation matters relating to counterfeits. 


Feds create puzzle not found on toy shelf


The owner of Pufferbelly Toys in St. Helens worries when Homeland Security agents show up on official business

Thursday, October 28, 2004
ASHBEL S. GREEN

Nothing about running a small store called Pufferbelly Toys prepared Stephanie Cox for a cryptic phone call from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.


"It's all very surreal, quite honestly," Cox said Wednesday. "I thought it was a prank when I first heard. I couldn't understand why Homeland Security would be investigating a tiny toy store in St. Helens."


The call came in late July or early August. A man identifying himself as a federal Homeland Security agent said he needed to talk to Cox at her store.


Cox asked what it was all about.


"He said he was not at liberty to discuss that," she said.


They agreed to meet in early August, but the agent later canceled. Cox thought the matter had blown over when the agent called back Sept. 9 to say he was coming out there.


"I was shaking in my shoes," said Cox, who has owned Pufferbelly Toys for more than four years. "My first thought was the government can shut your business down on a whim, in my opinion. If I'm closed even for a day that would cause undue stress."


The next day, two men arrived at the store and showed Cox their badges. The lead agent asked Cox whether she carried a toy called the Magic Cube. She said yes. The Magic Cube, he said, was an illegal copy of the Rubik's Cube, one of the most popular toys of all time. He told her to remove the Magic Cube from her shelves, and he watched to make sure she complied.


The whole thing took about 10 minutes.


After the agents left, Cox called the manufacturer of the Magic Cube, the Toysmith Group, which is based in Auburn, Wash. A representative told her that the Homeland Security agents had it wrong. The Rubik's Cube patent had expired, and the Magic Cube did not infringe on rival toy's trademark.


John Ryan, corporate counsel for the Toysmith Group, said Homeland Security, which includes Customs, routinely blocks shipments of products from overseas that violate intellectual property rights, such as patents, copyrights and trademarks.


"That's fine. That's not an outrageous federal act by any means," Ryan said. "But we certainly were surprised that a federal agent approached a toy store owner and frightened them."


Virginia Kice, a spokeswoman for Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said agents went to Pufferbelly based on a trademark infringement complaint filed in the agency's intellectual property rights center in Washington, D.C.


Kice also said Homeland Security officials routinely investigate such complaints and follow up if they determine they are valid.


"One of the things that our agency's responsible for doing is protecting the integrity of the economy and our nation's financial systems and obviously trademark infringement does have significant economic implications," she said.


After gaining assurances from Toysmith officials, Cox put the Magic Cube back on the shelf soon after the agents left.


Six weeks after her brush with Homeland Security, Cox is still scratching her head.


"Aren't there any terrorists out there?" she said.

October 28, 2004

Timex Avoids Taking a Licking

Undisputed copyright infringement committed by Timex, but it gets a multi-million dollar damages award against it vacated.


Polar Bear Productions v. Timex, 03-35188 (9th Cir. Oct 25, 2004).

October 27, 2004

ICANN Advances Addition of .POST and .TRAVEL Domains

ICANN has announced that it has begun 'commercial and technical'  negotiations regarding addition of a .POST tld sponsored by the Universal Postal Union, and a .TRAVEL tld sponsored by The Travel Partnership Corporation.

ROLE'X Spam Collateral Damage

Perhaps you have received several offers to purchase replica ROLEX (or ROLE'X, ROLE"X or ROLE.X) watches recently.  So did this listserv.  According to this blog, Rolex' attorneys saw the spam on the archived list, and sent a demand letter to the list operator.  This blog doesn't think that that was smart.


 

October 25, 2004

Soccer Fan Bids Kid's Name Adieu

Soccer fan turns over freddyadu.com to soccer sensation, Freddy Adu in UDRP.

Logos and Soccer

Arsenal and German goalie Jens Lehmann (left) has been ordered to wear ADIDAS brand gloves, if he wishes to keep his place on the German national team.  He has been wearing NIKE gloves for Arsenal.  Via Eurosport.com.  Thanks to John W. for the pointer.


NY Times article here about conflict between the UK soccer leagues and newspapers over depictions on logos in game photos, and mentions of sponsorships.  One paper, The Sun, has taken to stripping mentions of sponsorships.  For example The Coca Cola Championship is referred to simply as The Championship.

October 20, 2004

Don't Come Around Here No More

Interesting Ninth Circuit remedy via Law Meme.  After a broad range of abusive behavior, defendant was barred from accessing Plaintiff's otherwise public website.  Ninth Circuit:



[Defendant]  is in a position analogous to one who has repeatedly shoplifted from a particular store, so the judge prohibits him from entering it again, saving the store’s security guards from the burden of having to follow him around whenever he is there.


Creative Computing v. Getloaded, 02-35856 (9th Cir. Oct 15, 2004).

WWE v. Its Licensing Agent

WWE Accuses Licensing Agent of Corruption, via NY Times.

The Week In Counterfeiting

Counterfeiting at the Auld Lammas Fair.


'Say No To Fakes Week' in Scotland.


'Should Customs Turn Blind Eye To Counterfeiting?" in Malta.


Counterfeiting on the rise in South Africa.


'Synthetic DNA' Used to fight Counterfeiting.

Rosa Parks

CNN.COM article on controversy regarding Rosa Parks and her lawsuit against Outkast (background here).  This NY Times article suggests that Ms. Parks, who suffers from dementia, may not even be aware of the lawsuit.

Trademark Bling Bling



The Next Bling, jewellery consisting of logos, by the Dutch artist Tjepkema.  Link via Kottke.org.

October 19, 2004

Protecting The Brand Called Me

A Danish businessman, Joachim Bruss-Jensen, had a falling out with a business partner, who turned around and registered JOACHIMBRUSS-JENSEN.COM and BRUSS-JENSEN.COM.  While the registrant's actions appear to satisfy elements two and three of the UDRP, absence of bona fide interest, and bad faith, complainant failed in this UDRP, as he could not show tradmeark use of his personal name.


Two thoughts - to those who need to set up personal corporations, they may want to forego using a cute name and instead consider using their personal name in their corporate name.  Use of a personal name in this form has the added advantage of possibly creating rights under Article 8 of the Paris Convention.


The second thought : one hardcore critic of the UDRP has made the point that it gives preferential treatment to one class of names alone - trademarks.  A fraternal organization, for example, can have its name cybersquatted and it isn't eligible for protection under the UDRP. This case shows that to be true -why doesn't this businessman have a quick and affordable remedy?  However that isn't an argument against the UDRP - it's an argument for expanding the UDRP to include protection for personal and other names.

Tobacco Advertising In The UK

Tobacco Companies in Britain Assert Their Human Rights regarding tobacoo advertising, via Vice Squad.

PHAETON v. PHAETON



Russian company named Phaeton sues Volkswagen over use of PHAETON in Russia, via Just-auto.com.

This Is Your Brain On Brands



A study involving 67 people showed no preference for either Coca-Cola® (Coke®) or Pepsi® when the drinks were administered anonymously, according to results published in the Oct. 14 issue of the journal Neuron. However, when told what they were drinking, roughly three-fourths preferred Coke. All 67 also submitted to brain scans.


From: Scientists can now explain why the brain prefers one brand of soft drink to another in News-Medical.Net.


See also: If You Have a 'Buy Button' in Your Brain, What Pushes It?, in today's NY Times, discussing use of brain scans to conduct brand research, also known as 'neuromarketing.'  The article reports that the 'brand loyalty' part of the brain can override the 'original perferences' of the brain.

October 13, 2004

Stretch Pet Trade Dress Decision


Gateway Computers come in boxes with cow spots on them.  Companion Products sell 'stretch pets' which extend over a computer monitor or cpu.  Moose version depicted above.  They used to sell a cow with spots.  Gateway sued, alleging trade dress infringement, and prevailed.


Gateway v. Companion Products, 03-3410 (8th Cir sept 13, 2004).

GOOGLING, TIVO-LIKE, And Genericide

'Genericide,' is one phenomenon of trademark law that lay clients always seem to be aware of - that they could, in theory, lose their trademark if it becomes the generic term for that product (which I suppose is a secret fantasy of many clients). 


ASPIRIN, CELLOPHANE and ESCALATOR are famous examples of a brand losing its trademark status.  KLEENEX, BAND-AIDS and XEROX are famous examples of a brand retaining its status despite fairly widespread use by the public of those marks to designate the entire class of their respective products.


I don't think the term GOOGLING dilutes the GOOGLE trademark unless it is utilized to refer to using any search engine.


What to make of this sentence?: "Reuters reports that XM [satellite radio] is planning its own TIVO-like device."  It makes the trademark TIVO signify not the class of all DVRs (admittedly not a big class), but, somewhat inaccurately, to the functionality of all DVRs.


 

October 11, 2004

FAHRENHEIT 9/11, FAHRENHYPE 9/11, And Made You Look Confusion

I was watching CNN and what I thought was a commercial for Fahrenheit 9/11 when suddenly I see Mayor Koch calling Michael Moore a liar.  It was a commercial for Fahrenhype 9/11!  Made me look! 


By the way, if you type 'Fahrenhype 9/11' into Google, Google asks whether you meant 'Fahrenheit 9/11.'


Clearly the name FAHRENHYPE 9/11 was chosen to parody FAHRENHEIT 9/11.  But parody is not a absolute defense if there is confusion.


There're two types of potential confusion here.  The first is actual confusion - as in someone buys or rents the wrong DVD.  Who knows whether that is occurring. The second type (and, if I had to guess, the more probable in this instance), is initial interest confusion (long time Blog readers know of my obsession with this doctrine).  I was only exposed to Koch's (and, maybe, the makers of Fahrenhype's) views of Michael Moore because I was paying attention to what I thought was a commercial for FAHRENHEIT 9/11. I would not have paid any attention at all if the commercial had begun "Now, a DVD from someone who works for Fox News" (as does the individual who is credited with Fahrenhype).


And in this unusual situation, the transmission of the negative mesage about FAHRENHEIT, may be as important as sales of the FAHRENHYPE product.


If we were talking meta-tags, and this was the Seventh Circuit, then the mere 'made you look' effect alone would be actionable.

Cert Filed in Grokster

Cert petition filed by various movie studios and record labels in Grokster, via Scotus Blog.  Background here.

October 08, 2004

Tennis Ball Logo v. Tennis Ball Logo

Ellesse has sued Sean "P Diddy" Combs for trademark infringement in connection with his use of a tennis ball logo on his SEAN JOHN line of clothing.

Pixel Counts

The Trademark Office has relaxed its regulations regarding pixel count in drawings submitted.

October 07, 2004

Reading Other People's Mail con't

Here is a demand letter via The Smoking Gun written by Mary-Kate Olsen's representatives to the distributor of a Save Mary-Kate T-Shirt, alleging trademark, publicity and privacy right infringement.

Whatever

A bill 'imposing penalties on the creators of spyware,' The Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act (SPY ACT)  was approved by the Acronym Committee and passed by the full House, 399-1. 


The Senate is simultaneousy considering the Software Principles Yielding Better Levels of Consumer Knoweldge (SPY BLOCK) Act.


Via BBC.


 

CHANEL v. SEXYCHANEL.COM

Chanel sells sexy fashion and perfume. Sexy Chanel, now renamed Sexy Chanelle, sells, uh, escort services in Toronto.  Oddly, she charges $4000 for 12 hours but $10,000 for 24 hours.  In any event, Chanel has sued her over her use of the domain name SEXYCHANEL.COM.  Part of the problem is the perfume bottle on the home page.  Via The Toronto Star.

New IP Blogs

I've known Warwick Rothnie since before he took silk and became a barrister in Australia.  He now has an Australian IP blog named IPWar's.


The Unknown Tech Lawyer has also started an IP blog.

The Week In Counterfeiting

Counterfeiting in Ireland.


Counterfeiting in Russia.


Counterfeiting in Southern California.


Counterfeiting in Mexico.


Counterfeiting in India.

ENTREPRENEURial

NY Times article on Entrepreneur Media's numerous battles regarding rights over the mark ENTREPRENEUR.

October 06, 2004

Copyright Pledge

The Business Software Alliance is distributing the Cyber-Ethics Champion Code, a signed pledge for kids to not infringe copyright.

A UDRP Would Not Be Decided By Election Day

VP Cheney referred to 'factcheck.com' when he meant to say 'factcheck.org.'  Last night the .com resolved to one of those 'page o' links' holding pages.  Today it directs to George Soros' 'Why we must not re-elect President Bush' site.  Via John Palfrey.

Google Search Terms As Signs Of The Times

Pamela Parker Caird spots a sign using a Google search term, rather than a URL, as an Internet 'navigator.'

It Ain't What You Say, It's The Way That You Say It



Either the CIA or Chalabi must have told Cheney that he had never met Edwards before.  This is one of the at least two previous times Cheney didn't meet Edwards.

October 05, 2004

Keyword Sales of VIOXX

A MarketWatch article reporting that the keyword VIOXX is going for $11.88 a click on Overture.  I just searched the term and it appears that the first 15 Overture listings for VIOXX are for attorneys seeking plaintiffs regarding the recall.  Merck's vioxx.com site is number 18.  Google has 8 keyword ads for VIOXX, all for attorneys.


 


 


 


 

October 04, 2004

Client Conflict Is Not A Wonderful Thing

NY Times article (free sub required) on client conflicts, including one in a copyright case involving Michael Bolton and the song "Love Is A Wonderful Thing."


Practice pointer: Remember, an insurance company and the insured are adverse parties.

False or True But Misleading

More from Spinsanity on false and misleading statements from both sides in the presidential election campaign.

Resurrected Brands

Brandchannel on brands being revived by new owners, IRIDIUM and ATARI being examples.

Anti-Piracy Initiatives

The US Government has announced the Strategy Targeting Organized Piracy, or STOP - a series of IP protection initiatives.  One provision will allow the IP owner to obtain an injunction barring importation of an infringing item from any port, not, as is the case now, only the District Court for the jurisdiction where the port is located.  Via CNNMoney.


Separately, a consortium of high-tech companeis including HP, Sony and InterTrust, have announced the Coral Consortium, to develop inter-operable digital rights management products.

October 01, 2004

CECIL McBEE: Did Trap Sales Create Personal Jurisdiction?


Sometime after the jazz musician Cecil McBee played in Japan for the first time, someone opened a CECIL McBEE clothing store there and now it's a successful chain.  McBee has sued in Japan under a theory of right of personality, with mixed success.  A front page article in today's Wall Street Journal on the on-going dispute indicates (without comment) that McBee's US lawyers had agents order clothes from Japan to be shipped here.  McBee then used those sales to allege personal jurisdiction and sued the Japanese chain store here.  Hmmmm.  There are cases that have rejected this ploy, stating that a plaintiff may not manufacture personal jurisdiction over a defendant.  See, e.g. Maritz v. Cybergold (discussed in this journal article).


iBusinessLaw.info discussed the District Court case here and Perkins Coie discussed it here.  It is not clear whether the three sales to Maine referred to in the case are the 'trap' sales referred to in the article.